Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

If they want to set their own standards, let them modify

Posted on: August 2, 2018 at 16:42:01 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68191
Member For:
9.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the cars to meet them.

Their "standards" require others to do the work and pay for them. That is liberalism in a nutshell.

The one time a socialist state or locality wants high standards, and they are standards that will cost businesses money, make lawmakers feel good, are virtually impossible to attain and will have a negligible impact on the environment.

Another nutshell encapsulating liberal philosophy.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Evil Corrupt absolutely senseless and RCW RCW RCW - JG MU - 8/2 16:05:44
     if it's a giveaway to big oil, it means people will by cars - 90Tiger MU - 8/2 20:59:07
     Do you think 54.5 MPG by 2025 is attainable? How much does - hokie VT - 8/2 16:27:14
          Why can't California set its own standards? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/2 16:31:37
               The US Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate - Spanky KU - 8/2 16:42:45
                    and that provision is used very broadly for many things - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/2 16:50:57
                         Spanky also doesn't like it when states decide - MrBlueSky MU - 8/2 17:21:49
                              Wrong again.. I have repeatedly stated it should be a state - Spanky KU - 8/2 17:23:38
                         Do you think cars are not interstate commerce? - Spanky KU - 8/2 16:56:38
                              no. - DC Jayhawk KU - 8/2 20:16:13
               If they want to set their own standards, let them modify - hokie VT - 8/2 16:42:01
                    So you want the federal gov't to prohibit CA from - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/2 16:43:54
                         In this case, probably. Don't know enough to be - hokie VT - 8/2 16:47:48
                              Big government hokie (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 8/2 17:22:15
                         no... from regulating interstate commerce - Spanky KU - 8/2 16:46:28
          Easily - JG MU - 8/2 16:31:24
               Good. Thanx for that in depth answer. You, as a self - hokie VT - 8/2 16:45:23
                    Generously, I gave your question more - JG MU - 8/2 16:50:02
          Your last sentence sums it up perfectly(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 8/2 16:30:04
     DON’T TAKE MUH GUBMINT REGULATIONS! - MIZ45 MU - 8/2 16:26:52
          You realize that Trump taking away California's ability - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/2 16:30:22
               allowing illegals to vote-is that taking away anyones rights - afleet MU - 8/2 17:42:17
               Uh - MIZ45 MU - 8/2 16:51:42
     Nope - Spanky KU - 8/2 16:25:02
     MO GUBMIT PEASE!! JGCW JGCW JGCW JGCW JGCW JGCW - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 8/2 16:08:33
          wrong AS ALWAYS LIE BOY - JG MU - 8/2 16:09:45
               lol ole mullet loved him some Obama regulations - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 8/2 16:15:06
                    Obama wasn't very good for the environment - JG MU - 8/2 16:19:36
                         We know he wasn't quite far enough left for you - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 8/2 16:22:34
                              Luckily only the most demented delusional - JG MU - 8/2 16:26:53
     states rights are important - TigerJackSwartz MU - 8/2 16:06:49




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard