 |
|
That is an extremely weak rebuttal
Posted on: July 9, 2018 at 09:02:30 CT
Sal CMSU
Posts:
229171
Member For:
21.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Did you even read the article I posted? Solomon made no conclusions, but simply was reporting on the information being turned over and what it could possibly mean.
And the leak he is referring to was that of Carter Page's name.
Furthermore, in response to Solomon having a "conservative bias"
"John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal scientists’ misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption. He is The Hill’s executive vice president for video.
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill."
Edited by Sal at 09:04:35 on 07/09/18
And the leak he is referring to was that of Carter Page's name.
Furthermore, in response to Solomon having a "conservative bias"
"John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11 attacks, federal scientists’ misuse of foster children and veterans in drug experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption. He is The Hill’s executive vice president for video.
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill."
Edited by Sal at 09:04:35 on 07/09/18
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
That is an extremely weak rebuttal - Sal KC - 7/9 09:02:30