Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yes. They are lying. The IAEA has never asked for

Posted on: May 10, 2018 at 14:55:44 CT
tgr MU
Posts:
42102
Member For:
22.08 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
access to a military site since agreement went into effect. Iran hardliners have said they won't allow it but we have never asked for access and the document clearly allows it if the IAEA asks for it. The smarter move for Trump would have been for us to ask to access the military sites and then if they don't allow it, we withdrawal.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Just in case anyone wanted the truth about the Iran deal - tgr MU - 5/10 14:41:35
     RE: Just in case anyone wanted the truth about the Iran deal - sarasotatiger MU - 5/10 14:55:57
     You're simply continuing to live in unreality here (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 14:49:03
     Schumer's statement when he voted against the Iran Deal: - Spanky KU - 5/10 14:43:43
          Where in there does it say we cannot inspect military sites? - Badird MU - 5/10 15:17:38
               is it your contention inspectors can, in fact, inspect milit - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:27:42
                    From everything I have read, the IAEA is able to inspect - Badird MU - 5/10 15:32:20
                         It lists where the IAEA can inspect - Spanky KU - 5/10 16:12:39
                              So you disagree with the Director of the IAEA? - Badird MU - 5/10 16:17:49
                                   are you disgreeing with Chuck Schumer? - Spanky KU - 5/10 16:27:51
                         Everything other than stuff people have put in front of - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:41:36
                              Yeah, sorry I dont read everything you and Sal post. - Badird MU - 5/10 15:46:27
                                   IRAN can stop it. They are under no obligation to allow it - Spanky KU - 5/10 16:28:49
                                        Iran would be the ones nullifying the agreement, - Badird MU - 5/10 16:56:41
                                             It isn't IN the agreement.. so that action would not nullify - Spanky KU - 5/10 17:00:06
          RE: Schumer's statement when he voted against the Iran Deal: - sarasotatiger MU - 5/10 14:59:37
               Yes, Schumer voted against it because he didn't want... - Gyro MU - 5/10 15:13:32
               Those damn sneaky Jews, amiright?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:00:45
     Do they include military sites? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:42:52
          There is nothing in the document that denies inspections - tgr MU - 5/10 14:47:59
               Mohammad Bagher Nobakht said inspectors - Sal KC - 5/10 15:02:52
                    Damn those religious fanatics. Wait, we only hate the - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:04:41
               Then why are some saying that military sites havent been - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:49:28
                    Yes. They are lying. The IAEA has never asked for - tgr MU - 5/10 14:55:44
                         lol Jesus(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/10 15:32:14
                         Beat me to it. Was trying to explain this, as there is a LOT - Badird MU - 5/10 15:19:18
                              It's a simple question - Sal KC - 5/10 15:35:11
                                   Yes, Iran's leadership said that, Sal. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:44:12
                                        BUT IT DOESN'T SAY TAHT IN THE AGREEMENT AND - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:44:57
                                             Wow. Just wow. - Badird MU - 5/10 16:21:19
                                                  Iran said they are off limits - Sal KC - 5/10 17:35:55
                         RE: Yes. They are lying. The IAEA has never asked for - sarasotatiger MU - 5/10 15:08:38
                              what sanctions was he to lift? There were none to lift(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:09:52
                                   "Son, there ain't no draft any more" "There was one?" (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:42:20
                         lol, ok(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:56:59
                              you're wasting your time. he believes what he wants - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:04:14
                                   And how are you any fuking different? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/10 15:04:30
                                        I have provided data, news articles indicating a) Iran - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:08:00
                                             But but but, the deal was done by St. Barry so it must - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:09:16
                                                  did you see this jump of logic? what does this post tell you - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:10:41
                                                       you mean this is all partisan hackery? NO WAY!!(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:11:18
                              Tell me where I'm wrong. I will gladly admit it.(nm) - tgr MU - 5/10 14:58:21
                                   He can't because he has no clue (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/10 15:01:12
                                        Iran officials appear to believe - Sal KC - 5/10 15:09:23
                                             So, novel idea. Demand that inspectors be allowed on - MrBlueSky MU - 5/10 15:20:49
                                                  That is what Haley said - Sal KC - 5/10 15:26:00
                                                  lol, that's pretty much what just happened; along with Iran - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:23:58
                                   you were wrong on the Hooters case and probably wrong - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:59:58
                    dude not only not inspected but the IAEA hasn't - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 14:54:27
                         And there you admit that we have never even asked for it. - tgr MU - 5/10 14:57:27
                              b/c Iran told them they weren't allowed - Sal KC - 5/10 15:10:22
                              we? and it hasn't been asked for and hence you have - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:05:39
                              we? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:57:46
                                   Yes. The countries involved in the treaty and the IAEA.(nm) - tgr MU - 5/10 14:58:50
                                        hence Iran is "in compliance" and hence compliance with this - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:09:45
                                             unverified compliance(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:10:40
                                                  if you don't include the sites Iran wants excluded, what goo - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:11:41
                         tgr probably still thinks the firefighter at the Hooters is - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:56:34
               uh - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 14:49:21




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard