Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Just in case anyone wanted the truth about the Iran deal

Posted on: May 10, 2018 at 14:41:35 CT
tgr MU
Posts:
42102
Member For:
22.08 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and inspections, the document is below. The part about inspections is clearly laid out on page 42 in paragraphs 74-78, with paragraph 78 specifically laying out the timeframe for inspecting any site in the country. You don't have to be a lawyer to understand it and how the inspections work.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2165388/iran-deal-text.pdf
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Just in case anyone wanted the truth about the Iran deal - tgr MU - 5/10 14:41:35
     RE: Just in case anyone wanted the truth about the Iran deal - sarasotatiger MU - 5/10 14:55:57
     You're simply continuing to live in unreality here (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 14:49:03
     Schumer's statement when he voted against the Iran Deal: - Spanky KU - 5/10 14:43:43
          Where in there does it say we cannot inspect military sites? - Badird MU - 5/10 15:17:38
               is it your contention inspectors can, in fact, inspect milit - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:27:42
                    From everything I have read, the IAEA is able to inspect - Badird MU - 5/10 15:32:20
                         It lists where the IAEA can inspect - Spanky KU - 5/10 16:12:39
                              So you disagree with the Director of the IAEA? - Badird MU - 5/10 16:17:49
                                   are you disgreeing with Chuck Schumer? - Spanky KU - 5/10 16:27:51
                         Everything other than stuff people have put in front of - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:41:36
                              Yeah, sorry I dont read everything you and Sal post. - Badird MU - 5/10 15:46:27
                                   IRAN can stop it. They are under no obligation to allow it - Spanky KU - 5/10 16:28:49
                                        Iran would be the ones nullifying the agreement, - Badird MU - 5/10 16:56:41
                                             It isn't IN the agreement.. so that action would not nullify - Spanky KU - 5/10 17:00:06
          RE: Schumer's statement when he voted against the Iran Deal: - sarasotatiger MU - 5/10 14:59:37
               Yes, Schumer voted against it because he didn't want... - Gyro MU - 5/10 15:13:32
               Those damn sneaky Jews, amiright?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:00:45
     Do they include military sites? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:42:52
          There is nothing in the document that denies inspections - tgr MU - 5/10 14:47:59
               Mohammad Bagher Nobakht said inspectors - Sal KC - 5/10 15:02:52
                    Damn those religious fanatics. Wait, we only hate the - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:04:41
               Then why are some saying that military sites havent been - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:49:28
                    Yes. They are lying. The IAEA has never asked for - tgr MU - 5/10 14:55:44
                         lol Jesus(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 5/10 15:32:14
                         Beat me to it. Was trying to explain this, as there is a LOT - Badird MU - 5/10 15:19:18
                              It's a simple question - Sal KC - 5/10 15:35:11
                                   Yes, Iran's leadership said that, Sal. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:44:12
                                        BUT IT DOESN'T SAY TAHT IN THE AGREEMENT AND - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:44:57
                                             Wow. Just wow. - Badird MU - 5/10 16:21:19
                                                  Iran said they are off limits - Sal KC - 5/10 17:35:55
                         RE: Yes. They are lying. The IAEA has never asked for - sarasotatiger MU - 5/10 15:08:38
                              what sanctions was he to lift? There were none to lift(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:09:52
                                   "Son, there ain't no draft any more" "There was one?" (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:42:20
                         lol, ok(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:56:59
                              you're wasting your time. he believes what he wants - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:04:14
                                   And how are you any fuking different? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/10 15:04:30
                                        I have provided data, news articles indicating a) Iran - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:08:00
                                             But but but, the deal was done by St. Barry so it must - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:09:16
                                                  did you see this jump of logic? what does this post tell you - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:10:41
                                                       you mean this is all partisan hackery? NO WAY!!(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:11:18
                              Tell me where I'm wrong. I will gladly admit it.(nm) - tgr MU - 5/10 14:58:21
                                   He can't because he has no clue (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 5/10 15:01:12
                                        Iran officials appear to believe - Sal KC - 5/10 15:09:23
                                             So, novel idea. Demand that inspectors be allowed on - MrBlueSky MU - 5/10 15:20:49
                                                  That is what Haley said - Sal KC - 5/10 15:26:00
                                                  lol, that's pretty much what just happened; along with Iran - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:23:58
                                   you were wrong on the Hooters case and probably wrong - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:59:58
                    dude not only not inspected but the IAEA hasn't - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 14:54:27
                         And there you admit that we have never even asked for it. - tgr MU - 5/10 14:57:27
                              b/c Iran told them they weren't allowed - Sal KC - 5/10 15:10:22
                              we? and it hasn't been asked for and hence you have - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:05:39
                              we? (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:57:46
                                   Yes. The countries involved in the treaty and the IAEA.(nm) - tgr MU - 5/10 14:58:50
                                        hence Iran is "in compliance" and hence compliance with this - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:09:45
                                             unverified compliance(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 15:10:40
                                                  if you don't include the sites Iran wants excluded, what goo - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 15:11:41
                         tgr probably still thinks the firefighter at the Hooters is - hefeweizen MU - 5/10 14:56:34
               uh - 90Tiger MU - 5/10 14:49:21




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard