 |
|
Actually the are based on an algorithm of various different
Posted on: March 21, 2018 at 14:50:34 CT
tigerman81 MU
Posts:
22819
Member For:
16.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
factors.
In the case of Tomasello being ranked #1 while NC Lee was two basically came down to Tomasello beating guys that were more highly ranked during the season than Lee did, call it a "Quality of Win" component.
If you compare. The lowest ranked guy Tomasello wrestled all year was #61. Wereas Lee wrestled a #88, #95, #112, and #236 ranked guy at that weight. The WrestleStat rankings take into consideration the body of work done throughout the year not just the final results.
I know that seems odd, but think of it this way. If #1 and #2 wrestled 5 times, who would win that series? Lee/Tomasello wrestled 3 times this year, Lee won 2 of those 3. Lee also lost to the #7 and #15 guy where Tomasello lost only to the #2 guy.
At the end of the day the only thing that matters is the championship not rankings.
In the case of Tomasello being ranked #1 while NC Lee was two basically came down to Tomasello beating guys that were more highly ranked during the season than Lee did, call it a "Quality of Win" component.
If you compare. The lowest ranked guy Tomasello wrestled all year was #61. Wereas Lee wrestled a #88, #95, #112, and #236 ranked guy at that weight. The WrestleStat rankings take into consideration the body of work done throughout the year not just the final results.
I know that seems odd, but think of it this way. If #1 and #2 wrestled 5 times, who would win that series? Lee/Tomasello wrestled 3 times this year, Lee won 2 of those 3. Lee also lost to the #7 and #15 guy where Tomasello lost only to the #2 guy.
At the end of the day the only thing that matters is the championship not rankings.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Actually the are based on an algorithm of various different - tigerman81 MU - 3/21 14:50:34