Welcome Guest

No, you weren't. That would have been a private message.

Posted on: January 10, 2018 at 11:35:38 CT

RHAYWORTH MU

Posts:

44531

Member For:

16.17 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Instead, you posted a demand directed at tiger to all of us, leaving it open for discussion.

This isn't the picketopia board directed by professor pickle.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

A challenge to Tigrrrr - pickle MU

- 1/10 10:41:20

wrong board. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/10 11:34:01

so when will you actually engage in discussion? (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/10 11:44:08

At my convenience, not your idiotic demands. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/10 11:57:42

9.27 years and counting - pickle MU

- 1/10 12:02:05

Drug policy discussion is not welcomed on here? (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/10 11:35:43

You aren't that dumb. Demanding responses isn't. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/10 11:37:18

Tigrrr! is a fervent supporter of the war on drugs. - ummmm MU - 1/10 11:40:32

Make me - Tigrrrr! MU

- 1/10 11:00:27

well - pickle MU

- 1/10 11:04:37

Then go away. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 1/10 11:06:11

you don't and never will. - pickle MU

- 1/10 11:11:30

Funny.... - Tigrrrr! MU

- 1/10 11:38:58

what an odd reply (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/10 11:45:08

You are viewed by many to be the board - Tigrrrr! MU

- 1/10 11:47:48

i really couldn't care less. - pickle MU

- 1/10 11:50:33

And I already told you the problems with it, at YOUR - GA Tiger MU - 1/10 10:48:42

RE: And I already told you the problems with it, at YOUR - ummmm MU - 1/10 10:55:43

Ok. Some reasons for my initial response. And I was - GA Tiger MU - 1/10 12:12:44

I think you misunderstood the literal meaning of the - ummmm MU - 1/10 12:38:16

i was talking to Tigrrr. GAT (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/10 10:50:07

No, you weren't. That would have been a private message. - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/10 11:35:38

it was clearly addressed to Tigrrr - pickle MU

- 1/10 11:49:02

It's the burr under pickle's saddle board. - Tigrrrr! MU

- 1/10 11:40:11