that's NOT it and you know it. why are you willfully being
Posted on: December 14, 2017 at 12:31:03 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14266
Member For:
19.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ignorant?
the part where he called Trump a douche etc is not that relevant. although also not good. he could never be used as a witness in this case just for saying that alone.
but more importantly some of his texts, and you know this, make reference to him doing something to "save" the country. what was he doing? what did he mean?
it sure sounds like he was planning on using his position to thwart one investigation and manufacture another. that's ONE logical conclusion. and if it ever came to it that's exactly what a defense atty would argue.
anything he touched on the SC case is f*cked. doesn't matter if he was removed or fired. the whole case is tainted. that's exactly what happens when a dirty cop is found out. his entire case history can be called into question.
Edited by blake1771 at 12:34:55 on 12/14/17