no it doesnt. but he had an ABNORMAL bias. but to the
Posted on: December 14, 2017 at 12:19:37 CT
blake1771 MU
Posts:
14266
Member For:
19.27 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
broader point the whole idea of a SC is to negate the bias and conflicts present in the standing investigators and remove even any perception of conflict or bias.
so if that's the whole reason for appointing a special counsel why would you purposefully stack the deck with people who are knee deep in the same sh*t you're allegedly trying to avoid?
granted i don't know how well known Strozk's views were, but apparently, someone knew b/c I can't for the life of me think why the IG would need his text messages otherwise.
but some of the others had ties to fusion had reprented people involving the clintion email investigation etc.
and 10 of them are registered Dems. and of those who gave they 100% gave to HRC and 0 to DJT.
this case is going to be nitpicked to death no matter what the call so why have even the appearance of any impropriety?