Sorry Bud, but you’re wrong here. You don’t have a clue...

Posted on: December 6, 2017 at 21:18:38 CT

Amazingly, you still can’t comprehend the City/County dynamics exclusive to STL, smh.

Here are the FBI stats:

Urban Crime Rate rankings, including all Violent Crime (inner 20% of the Metro), which accounts for the City of STL in STL’s ranking), which shows STL & kc virtually tied as far as crime rate, but that is where 98% of STL’s Crime is (a couple of enclaves in the City of STL) & what accounts for the skewed, faulty stats/rankings that rank STL the 2nd most dangerous city, while at the same time, ranking it the 2nd safest City/Metro Area:

https://i.imgur.com/vrRsEkp.jpg

NOW, here is the Suburban Crime Rate rankings, including all Violent Crime (outer 80% of the Metro), & it not even close. KC’s much more widespread & substantially higher Crime Rate (3x in fact) is reflected in a much smaller area/Metro to boot!!!! (Top 40 Media Market vs a Top 20 Media Market). Meanwhile STL’s Metro is ranked 2nd Safest!:

https://i.imgur.com/MPwID7f.jpg

Finally, here is the Total Metro Crime Rate, including all Violent Crime, of the Top 50 Cities solidifying kc’s significantly much higher crime rate & highest in Missouri. It’s not even close!!:

https://i.imgur.com/llHR1Hi.jpg


I know exactly what I am talking about & always have.

There other reports based on FBI stats that measure reported crimes throughout Metros that exhibit how much more widespread kc’s crime, including all violent crime, by showing it in distances from the city cores with the resulting percentages of crime. It is restricted to a couple of islands in the City of STL, while in kc it is all over the place, including massively more throughout the suburbs there.

Stay blind & feed yourself a bunch of fake propaganda, I don’t care, but reality & facts dictate otherwise.