Welcome Guest

This is what the First Amendment "actually" says:

Posted on: November 21, 2017 at 21:51:45 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44901

Member For:

13.42 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

I guess "the law" doesn't "actually" count here. Just the whims of activist jurists.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Hey libs, wanna mock those who say there’s a war on religion - hokie VT - 11/21 20:57:13

Next, they will say it's ok for Achmed the Goatfvcker to - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/22 07:09:47

Why is a publicly funded shelter endorsing religion? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/21 23:27:11

blessing animals? - pickle MU

- 11/21 21:08:45

So what is wrong with silly? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:15:26

Right there with turkey pardons.(nm) - Toger STL - 11/21 21:10:22

Nothing in the Constitution says the government should be - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:04:02

1st Amendment...you should re-read it - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/21 23:29:52

Amazingly stupid post. You are suggesting that tolerating - hokie VT - 11/22 08:51:35

Freedom from Religion but not Freedom from God. The - STL1DFW STL - 11/21 23:42:33

"sick, hateful people" - pickle MU

- 11/21 21:09:51

Satanic people possessed by the devil that hate Christianity - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/21 21:36:53

There literally is(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:09:11

There isn’t - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:14:35

First amendment - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:16:24

Correct - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:21:10

What you do is irrelevant - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:27:48

It is not a statement of neutrality - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:29:51

What do you think a forced blessing at a government - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/21 23:32:52

It's definitely not Congress making a law - ummmm MU - 11/22 09:22:39

and protecting citizens against government promotion - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:33:47

It says nothing about promotion (nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:35:27

It says nothing about anything that you guys are arguing - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:53:01

Actually, it is literally a restriction on the actions of - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:29:18

This is an absolutely idiotic discussion - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:35:55

You're the one invoking the word "literally" - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:38:37

that is shoe (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/21 22:14:17

clean up boy(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/21 22:19:51

ummmm regularly embarrasses you and it's terrific - 90Tiger MU - 11/22 06:53:44

You guys are both wrong. - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:25:06

Well until we live in a collective of states again - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:28:35

RE: Well until we live in a collective of states again - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:31:41

How does that make me wrong? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:28:10

"Nothing in the Constitution says the government"... - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:30:39

Were is not for wrongful Supreme Court action you may be - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:34:39

Judicial activism doesn't change the plain meaning - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:37:59

Unfortunately, judicial activism does change these issues - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:49:31

This is what the First Amendment "actually" says: - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:51:45

Your mama and daddy did that.(nm) - Toger STL - 11/21 21:29:31

You are a poop mouth - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:30:55