Welcome Guest

It is not a statement of neutrality

Posted on: November 21, 2017 at 21:29:51 CT

4TigersinMichigan MU

Posts:

126518

Member For:

22.72 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

It is a statement protecting citizens from forced religion. That is a different thing altogether.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Hey libs, wanna mock those who say there’s a war on religion - hokie VT - 11/21 20:57:13

Next, they will say it's ok for Achmed the Goatfvcker to - Tigrrrr! MU

- 11/22 07:09:47

Why is a publicly funded shelter endorsing religion? Nm - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/21 23:27:11

blessing animals? - pickle MU

- 11/21 21:08:45

So what is wrong with silly? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:15:26

Right there with turkey pardons.(nm) - Toger STL - 11/21 21:10:22

Nothing in the Constitution says the government should be - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:04:02

1st Amendment...you should re-read it - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/21 23:29:52

Amazingly stupid post. You are suggesting that tolerating - hokie VT - 11/22 08:51:35

Freedom from Religion but not Freedom from God. The - STL1DFW STL - 11/21 23:42:33

"sick, hateful people" - pickle MU

- 11/21 21:09:51

Satanic people possessed by the devil that hate Christianity - Uncle Fester USMC - 11/21 21:36:53

There literally is(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:09:11

There isn’t - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:14:35

First amendment - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:16:24

Correct - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:21:10

What you do is irrelevant - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:27:48

It is not a statement of neutrality - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:29:51

What do you think a forced blessing at a government - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/21 23:32:52

It's definitely not Congress making a law - ummmm MU - 11/22 09:22:39

and protecting citizens against government promotion - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:33:47

It says nothing about promotion (nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:35:27

It says nothing about anything that you guys are arguing - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:53:01

Actually, it is literally a restriction on the actions of - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:29:18

This is an absolutely idiotic discussion - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:35:55

You're the one invoking the word "literally" - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:38:37

that is shoe (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/21 22:14:17

clean up boy(nm) - TheShoe STL - 11/21 22:19:51

ummmm regularly embarrasses you and it's terrific - 90Tiger MU - 11/22 06:53:44

You guys are both wrong. - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:25:06

Well until we live in a collective of states again - TheShoe STL - 11/21 21:28:35

RE: Well until we live in a collective of states again - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:31:41

How does that make me wrong? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:28:10

"Nothing in the Constitution says the government"... - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:30:39

Were is not for wrongful Supreme Court action you may be - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:34:39

Judicial activism doesn't change the plain meaning - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:37:59

Unfortunately, judicial activism does change these issues - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:49:31

This is what the First Amendment "actually" says: - ummmm MU - 11/21 21:51:45

Your mama and daddy did that.(nm) - Toger STL - 11/21 21:29:31

You are a poop mouth - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 11/21 21:30:55