No, you're ignoring an obvious problem with your narrative..
Posted on: June 28, 2017 at 13:05:20 CT
Gyro MU
Posts:
52294
Member For:
23.09 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
which is that you are making a legal conclusion, which you intimate is obvious, but oddly has never reached the Supreme Court. General rule of law if that something is not up to Constitutional muster, eventually a case will come along that holds that.
The law is subject to interpretation. I told my niece that five years ago and she's 10.