Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Who says we were wrong to launch the airstrike. I am pretty

Posted on: April 7, 2017 at 11:13:02 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51159
Member For:
16.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ambivalent about it. But if they have good intel that this was the location the chemical weapons strike emanated from then I do not see the strike as wrong.

Syrian lives are not really our concern but if we can save a few of them at no real risk to our selves then I have no problem with doing so.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I'll try again. Suppose we find that our bombing of an - hokie VT - 4/7 10:54:04
     This is the calculus and it is likely correct. - Coors4bob MU - 4/7 11:40:56
     You got that right; you're an idiot - pickle MU - 4/7 11:16:17
     Suppose we find out that Assad didn't do the gassing - JG MU - 4/7 11:08:15
          Assad did the gassing - Coors4bob MU - 4/7 11:41:34
          Saving lives of innocents is not worth it. Why? Serious - hokie VT - 4/7 11:16:45
     that's a lot of 'suppose' - BeakerHater MU - 4/7 11:02:47
          Who says we were wrong to launch the airstrike. I am pretty - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/7 11:13:02
               I speak for myself - BeakerHater MU - 4/7 11:40:57
               Where is the line designating, "no real risk to us?" That is - hokie VT - 4/7 11:23:41
               Why don't you care about Syrian lives?(nm) - cnk ATL - 4/7 11:23:39
                    Protecting Syrian lives was the point behind this attack. - DHighlander NWMSU - 4/7 12:16:49
                    Syrian Military lives, fixed it. - Coors4bob MU - 4/7 11:42:20
                         I don't think that's what he meant - cnk ATL - 4/7 11:44:50
                         The strike killed civilians, including children (nm) - BeakerHater MU - 4/7 11:43:08
               I do. The US was wrong to attack Syria (nm) - pickle MU - 4/7 11:22:40
          If you were satisfied that our actions saved the lives of - hokie VT - 4/7 11:08:30
          It was probably the right approach. - Alferd Packer MU - 4/7 11:07:21
               Good point. I hadn't thought of that. Russian warships are - hokie VT - 4/7 11:21:03
     RE: I'll try again. Suppose we find that our bombing of an - sarasotatiger MU - 4/7 11:01:28
          You may be right. But nothing obama did had any impact on - hokie VT - 4/7 11:06:10
               RE: You may be right. But nothing obama did had any impact on - sarasotatiger MU - 4/7 11:13:52
     For those that support the military action, why - Mormad MU - 4/7 11:00:18
          Fair question and the answer, is I dunno. But we have - hokie VT - 4/7 11:04:52
               I'm curious to see the damage reports - Mormad MU - 4/7 11:22:53
                    I said the same last night. I would like to know and i've - hokie VT - 4/7 11:26:05
     imo, no - cnk ATL - 4/7 10:56:45
          Clearly you are correct about hostile nations and leaders. - hokie VT - 4/7 11:00:48
               the slaughter of innocents should not go unpunished - cnk ATL - 4/7 11:05:29
                    I considered that. And while i do not want to be the world - hokie VT - 4/7 11:13:26
                         The first step is determining who actually did the attack(nm) - cnk ATL - 4/7 11:18:06
                              My understanding is that we had solid intel on that. And - hokie VT - 4/7 11:27:40
                                   Why does the US have to determine that? - cnk ATL - 4/7 11:33:42
               RE: Clearly you are correct about hostile nations and leaders. - sarasotatiger MU - 4/7 11:05:12
               You do realize - meatiger MU - 4/7 11:02:05
                    Obama was a laughing stock. His rules of engagement were - hokie VT - 4/7 11:19:46
     And what in the history of the world - meatiger MU - 4/7 10:55:38
          That's your response? How about an answer? If we - hokie VT - 4/7 10:57:28




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard