Welcome Guest

Not explicitly, but it falls under Section 5

Posted on: April 6, 2017 at 14:15:52 CT

pickle MU

Posts:

267340

Member For:

26.43 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

"Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member."

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Does anyone believe Schumer would not have - Spanky KU - 4/6 12:57:22

No Filibuster in the constitution. No reason not to abolish - Tigerfish MU - 4/6 13:39:45

It's constitutional. Read article I (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/6 13:50:28

is Filibuster in the Constitution? - Silas MU - 4/6 14:04:51

Not explicitly, but it falls under Section 5 - pickle MU

- 4/6 14:15:52

So both wings of the liberal party are alike you - JG A - 4/6 13:08:33

In this case, yes. - Spanky KU - 4/6 13:19:20

👽✈️🚶🏻🌋👻 - Emoji Man MSU - 4/6 13:12:17

Never gets old - Ferg STL - 4/6 13:32:21

LOL - JG A - 4/6 13:36:08

Of course they would have...but that was the Dem goal though - mizzoumurfkc MU

- 4/6 13:08:10

We all lost when they played games with Bork - FootballRefugee MU

- 4/6 13:10:51

Who cares? (nm) - pickle MU

- 4/6 13:06:16

Congress is so rigged that it would try or do - Evenflow MU - 4/6 13:01:06

of course not - cnk ATL - 4/6 13:00:28

He'd have done it already (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 4/6 12:59:43