Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No Filibuster in the constitution. No reason not to abolish

Posted on: April 6, 2017 at 13:39:45 CT
Tigerfish MU
Posts:
15487
Member For:
23.73 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
And nuclear is such a stupid name for this. It's Harry Reid. It's a dirty bomb at best.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Does anyone believe Schumer would not have - Spanky KU - 4/6 12:57:22
     No Filibuster in the constitution. No reason not to abolish - Tigerfish MU - 4/6 13:39:45
          It's constitutional. Read article I (nm) - pickle MU - 4/6 13:50:28
               is Filibuster in the Constitution? - Silas MU - 4/6 14:04:51
                    Not explicitly, but it falls under Section 5 - pickle MU - 4/6 14:15:52
     So both wings of the liberal party are alike you - JG A - 4/6 13:08:33
          In this case, yes. - Spanky KU - 4/6 13:19:20
          👽✈️🚶🏻🌋👻 - Emoji Man MSU - 4/6 13:12:17
               Never gets old - Ferg STL - 4/6 13:32:21
                    LOL - JG A - 4/6 13:36:08
     Of course they would have...but that was the Dem goal though - mizzoumurfkc MU - 4/6 13:08:10
          We all lost when they played games with Bork - FootballRefugee MU - 4/6 13:10:51
     Who cares? (nm) - pickle MU - 4/6 13:06:16
     Congress is so rigged that it would try or do - Evenflow MU - 4/6 13:01:06
     of course not - cnk ATL - 4/6 13:00:28
     He'd have done it already (nm) - MUGuy2004 STL - 4/6 12:59:43




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard