Yep.. I said that in my post.
Posted on: March 17, 2017 at 11:26:34 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
138270
Member For:
19.85 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It may not need an Amendment, however...
just a SCOTUS decision that the 14th Amendment interpretation in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) was improper and return to the interpretation used in Elk v. Wilkins (1884)
Edited by Spanky at 11:26:44 on 03/17/17