Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Yep.. I said that in my post.

Posted on: March 17, 2017 at 11:26:34 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146461
Member For:
21.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It may not need an Amendment, however...

just a SCOTUS decision that the 14th Amendment interpretation in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) was improper and return to the interpretation used in Elk v. Wilkins (1884)

Edited by Spanky at 11:26:44 on 03/17/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

When Trump dreamed up his wall, wonder if he - GA Tiger MU - 3/17 08:37:14
     You should not have to go to court for the wall. - Coors4bob MU - 3/17 14:35:12
     Practicality/feasibility doesn't appear to be... - molon labe KC - 3/17 10:26:05
     Not sure they need it... - Salty Dog MU - 3/17 09:56:01
     Trump anticipating something - meatiger MU - 3/17 09:22:32
     eliminating the income tax would result in - SwampTiger MU - 3/17 09:14:12
     I think the "wall" was in "air quotes" - mu7176grad MU - 3/17 08:41:58
          A 'virtual wall' would be more effective: - Spanky KU - 3/17 10:38:18
               Beats by far the wall. Wouldn't no. 1 need a C. amendment?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/17 11:12:19
                    Yep.. I said that in my post. - Spanky KU - 3/17 11:26:34
                         Interesting.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/17 20:48:10
          I figure DC has so many unneeded lawyers they - GA Tiger MU - 3/17 08:43:48
               Tell them they are helping illegals apply for benefits - mu7176grad MU - 3/17 08:57:48
     The only way it can be done - El-ahrairah KC - 3/17 08:38:56
          Wouldn't you give up some land to #MAGA?(nm) - glue MU - 3/17 08:50:35




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard