Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Constitutionally speaking, your scenario is left to

Posted on: March 3, 2017 at 13:42:41 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the states. Just like how Marijuana should be.

And then of course, the states should also have no laws against marijuana as a matter of principle and in the interests of human freedom.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Just checked the Constitution - pickle MU - 3/3 13:15:56
     Me too. And I noticed it says NOTHING about - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:39:48
          You do know the purpose of the Constitution - pickle MU - 3/3 14:04:58
               If it does not apply to individual behavior, then - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 14:21:14
                    Wow. You really are ignorant. (nm) - Tiger_Claw MU - 3/3 14:34:20
                         So, uh, break it down for us, ok. We sit at - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 16:34:31
                         like really really ignorant(nm) - Panthera MU - 3/3 15:08:58
                    Holy ****, GAT. I just told you - pickle MU - 3/3 14:28:58
                    With some very limited exceptions (especially those found in - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:23:32
                         Yes, and the only relevant actions that we care about - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 14:37:23
                              The fact that the fed govt tramples the Constitution - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:42:03
                                   Presumably. Was that a rebuttal of anything I've said?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 16:23:25
          Constitutionally speaking, your scenario is left to - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:42:41
               Given also that is has medicinal value.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:44:36
                    sure. (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:45:35
     RE: Just checked the Constitution - Tigrrrr! MU - 3/3 13:22:40
     Commerce Clause - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:19:38
          No, that's not what the clause means (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 13:26:31
               What does it mean? - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:30:21
                    RE: What does it mean? - pickle MU - 3/3 13:38:10
                         It means: "to govern by restriction" - Spanky KU - 3/3 16:49:59
                              No it doesn't - pickle MU - 3/3 17:47:37
                                   It clearly does mean what I posted - Spanky KU - 3/3 18:32:59
                         lol that's awesome - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 13:44:00
                              Isn't it? - pickle MU - 3/3 14:06:47
                                   no that's not why it's awesome - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:10:58
                              His analysis is spot on (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:45:11
                                   lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:01:15
                                        There's the "lol" key (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:10:55
                                             yeah a lol is all these posts deserve - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:12:11
                                                  Wait, when did you try to explain this to pickle? - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:13:19
                                                       not this particular topic, but in general - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:17:49
                                                            Post a link on a different topic then. - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:19:41
                                                                 to be honest I've never seen a substantive post from you - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:37:59
                                                                      Then you should pay closer attention. I have at least 4 - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:41:07
                                                                           lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:46:50
                         Hey pic, here's what we should do. We need - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:43:38
                              Hey, GAT - pickle MU - 3/3 14:02:46
                              A seriously weird retort, GAT (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:44:27
                                   Not for pickle. Should make sense to him. Else - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:50:31
                                        Stressing the original intent behind words in a document - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:11:45
                                             Not in a rational world. But if the constitutional - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 14:25:21
                                                  Please explain. Drop some knowledge on me (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 14:27:43
                                                       Between GAT and Ragnar, there is a lot of explaining - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:30:10
                                                  Yes, the framers/ratifiers did include something for - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:26:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard