Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

What does it mean?

Posted on: March 3, 2017 at 13:30:21 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146380
Member For:
21.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
Do you think the Feds have ANY laws against the possession or sale of pot that is grown and sold inside the same state?

Please point out ANY federal law that governs ANY pot (or heroin for that matter) possession, use or sale that doesn't cross a state line or international border.....or doesn't take place on federal lands.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Just checked the Constitution - pickle MU - 3/3 13:15:56
     Me too. And I noticed it says NOTHING about - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:39:48
          You do know the purpose of the Constitution - pickle MU - 3/3 14:04:58
               If it does not apply to individual behavior, then - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 14:21:14
                    Wow. You really are ignorant. (nm) - Tiger_Claw MU - 3/3 14:34:20
                         So, uh, break it down for us, ok. We sit at - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 16:34:31
                         like really really ignorant(nm) - Panthera MU - 3/3 15:08:58
                    Holy ****, GAT. I just told you - pickle MU - 3/3 14:28:58
                    With some very limited exceptions (especially those found in - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:23:32
                         Yes, and the only relevant actions that we care about - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 14:37:23
                              The fact that the fed govt tramples the Constitution - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:42:03
                                   Presumably. Was that a rebuttal of anything I've said?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 16:23:25
          Constitutionally speaking, your scenario is left to - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:42:41
               Given also that is has medicinal value.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:44:36
                    sure. (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:45:35
     RE: Just checked the Constitution - Tigrrrr! MU - 3/3 13:22:40
     Commerce Clause - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:19:38
          No, that's not what the clause means (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 13:26:31
               What does it mean? - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:30:21
                    RE: What does it mean? - pickle MU - 3/3 13:38:10
                         It means: "to govern by restriction" - Spanky KU - 3/3 16:49:59
                              No it doesn't - pickle MU - 3/3 17:47:37
                                   It clearly does mean what I posted - Spanky KU - 3/3 18:32:59
                         lol that's awesome - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 13:44:00
                              Isn't it? - pickle MU - 3/3 14:06:47
                                   no that's not why it's awesome - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:10:58
                              His analysis is spot on (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:45:11
                                   lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:01:15
                                        There's the "lol" key (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:10:55
                                             yeah a lol is all these posts deserve - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:12:11
                                                  Wait, when did you try to explain this to pickle? - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:13:19
                                                       not this particular topic, but in general - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:17:49
                                                            Post a link on a different topic then. - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:19:41
                                                                 to be honest I've never seen a substantive post from you - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:37:59
                                                                      Then you should pay closer attention. I have at least 4 - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:41:07
                                                                           lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 3/3 14:46:50
                         Hey pic, here's what we should do. We need - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:43:38
                              Hey, GAT - pickle MU - 3/3 14:02:46
                              A seriously weird retort, GAT (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:44:27
                                   Not for pickle. Should make sense to him. Else - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 13:50:31
                                        Stressing the original intent behind words in a document - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:11:45
                                             Not in a rational world. But if the constitutional - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 14:25:21
                                                  Please explain. Drop some knowledge on me (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 14:27:43
                                                       Between GAT and Ragnar, there is a lot of explaining - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:30:10
                                                  Yes, the framers/ratifiers did include something for - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:26:48




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard