Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

His answer to the question

Posted on: March 2, 2017 at 11:25:59 CT
mizzoumurfkc KC
Posts:
62952
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
was not really responsive. He voluntarily offered the info about himself...unnecessarily.
I realize it's possible he was talking about his role with the campaign but he didn't even need to answer that way.
I have no idea where this will lead but with the climate in the fall about Russians trying to influence our election, why wouldn't he have been more astute about it?
Maybe he should have said in the confirmation hearing that he met with the Russian ambassador in his capacity as a Senator...but he didn't. and hear we are.
And of course the left wing is pouncing on this...this has been the climate in DC since Clinton was elected.
They're all just a bunch of partisan hacks.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So if a Republican lies under oath, it's no big deal? (nm) - Tiger_Claw MU - 3/2 10:56:20
     You're being disingenuous here. Obviously the - 90Tiger MU - 3/2 10:58:51
     charge him or shut up(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/2 10:57:30
     They ALL lie. Every one of them. Dems, Repubs, all of - Diamond Dave MU - 3/2 10:57:29
     He didn't necessarily lie (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 3/2 10:57:01
          No. He just lied - mizzoumurfkc MU - 3/2 11:02:18
               No he didnt. The question was asked in re to the campaign. - hefeweizen MU - 3/2 11:04:40
                    And speaking of context... - mizzoumurfkc MU - 3/2 11:31:25
                    His answer to the question - mizzoumurfkc MU - 3/2 11:25:59
                    Sen. Pat Leahy asked the specific ? about the campaign and - Mo Texan MU - 3/2 11:20:19
               You can't tell for sure that he lied - mizzouSECedes STL - 3/2 11:04:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard