Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No he didnt. The question was asked in re to the campaign.

Posted on: March 2, 2017 at 11:04:40 CT
hefeweizen MU
Posts:
124295
Member For:
10.21 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
if he didnt consider his meeting with him in his office in that capacity, he was telling the 100% truth. You always seemed like a level headed guy to me and in your profession, you of all people know that answers to questions MUST be put into context.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So if a Republican lies under oath, it's no big deal? (nm) - Tiger_Claw MU - 3/2 10:56:20
     You're being disingenuous here. Obviously the - 90Tiger MU - 3/2 10:58:51
     charge him or shut up(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 3/2 10:57:30
     They ALL lie. Every one of them. Dems, Repubs, all of - Diamond Dave MU - 3/2 10:57:29
     He didn't necessarily lie (nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 3/2 10:57:01
          No. He just lied - mizzoumurfkc MU - 3/2 11:02:18
               No he didnt. The question was asked in re to the campaign. - hefeweizen MU - 3/2 11:04:40
                    And speaking of context... - mizzoumurfkc MU - 3/2 11:31:25
                    His answer to the question - mizzoumurfkc MU - 3/2 11:25:59
                    Sen. Pat Leahy asked the specific ? about the campaign and - Mo Texan MU - 3/2 11:20:19
               You can't tell for sure that he lied - mizzouSECedes STL - 3/2 11:04:29




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard