Welcome Guest

It doesn't work like that,

Posted on: February 23, 2017 at 11:41:17 CT
justwinbaby KC
Posts:
20548
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
scotus determined that the seized property would have to be property obtained by racketeering.

the "seize property" issue is more or less the author and his interviewees extrapolating on racketeering laws and punishment. wrong tree.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     govt's shouldn't be seizing assets (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/23 10:00:38
     It's about time! Libbies used it to stop anti-abortion - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:00:33
          You and your facist views - catbirdseat MU - 2/23 10:59:02
          of course (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 10:11:27
          Something about two wrongs... (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:10:40
               No.. legal precedence - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:20:03
                    Such a Spanky response. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:21:22
                         Yep.. A legal response to a legal question - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:23:49
                              Yes, I am upset that RICO laws exist. - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:27:05
                                   I'll change my question to "would you agree" instead - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:35:14
                                        If they caused damages? Yes. They should pay for that - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:43:58
                                             It doesn't work like that, - justwinbaby KC - 2/23 11:41:17
                                                  Cool.... I assumed it meant 'paying fines' to offset - Spanky KU - 2/23 11:47:32
                                             If I am at a protest with my sign, and then a riot breaks - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:52:52
                                                  That would not meet the standard, would it? - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:58:58
                                                       I couldn't open the article so I may have - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 11:01:32
                                                            You notice that too, huh? (nm) - pickle MU - 2/23 11:21:37
                                                                 he did it on the football board for years - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 11:46:56
                                                            No.. It just adds rioting to the list of chargeable RICO - Spanky KU - 2/23 11:06:19
                                   Were their assets seized? - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:29:36
                                        RE: Were their assets seized? - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:35:25
                              you decided it was a "legal question" (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/23 10:26:50
                                   The OP is about a legal matter - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:28:50
     Let's be careful here. While it is fine today, - hokie VT - 2/23 09:56:46
          RE: Let's be careful here. While it is fine today, - justwinbaby KC - 2/23 10:16:58
          Yes, there will. The winning side usually starts off by - GA Tiger MU - 2/23 10:00:02
     Thats overkill, as usual. If anything, increase penalties - GA Tiger MU - 2/23 09:56:03
          Libbies used it against anti-abortion protests - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:01:34
     So I should just start a company that show's up at - catbirdseat MU - 2/23 09:53:37
     That is damned fine.(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/23 09:51:01
          Lol. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/23 09:53:20
          of course (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 09:52:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard