Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

If they caused damages? Yes. They should pay for that

Posted on: February 23, 2017 at 10:43:58 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146272
Member For:
20.99 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
1
damage.

If you conspire with someone to vandalize someone's home, should your assets be seized in order to compensate the owner for his losses?

Edited by Spanky at 10:51:25 on 02/23/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

SIAP arizona votes to seize assets of those who plan, - justwinbaby KC - 2/23 09:44:15
     govt's shouldn't be seizing assets (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/23 10:00:38
     It's about time! Libbies used it to stop anti-abortion - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:00:33
          You and your facist views - catbirdseat MU - 2/23 10:59:02
          of course (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 10:11:27
          Something about two wrongs... (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:10:40
               No.. legal precedence - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:20:03
                    Such a Spanky response. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:21:22
                         Yep.. A legal response to a legal question - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:23:49
                              Yes, I am upset that RICO laws exist. - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:27:05
                                   I'll change my question to "would you agree" instead - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:35:14
                                        If they caused damages? Yes. They should pay for that - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:43:58
                                             It doesn't work like that, - justwinbaby KC - 2/23 11:41:17
                                                  Cool.... I assumed it meant 'paying fines' to offset - Spanky KU - 2/23 11:47:32
                                             If I am at a protest with my sign, and then a riot breaks - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:52:52
                                                  That would not meet the standard, would it? - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:58:58
                                                       I couldn't open the article so I may have - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 11:01:32
                                                            You notice that too, huh? (nm) - pickle MU - 2/23 11:21:37
                                                                 he did it on the football board for years - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 11:46:56
                                                            No.. It just adds rioting to the list of chargeable RICO - Spanky KU - 2/23 11:06:19
                                   Were their assets seized? - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:29:36
                                        RE: Were their assets seized? - ummmm MU - 2/23 10:35:25
                              you decided it was a "legal question" (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/23 10:26:50
                                   The OP is about a legal matter - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:28:50
     Let's be careful here. While it is fine today, - hokie VT - 2/23 09:56:46
          RE: Let's be careful here. While it is fine today, - justwinbaby KC - 2/23 10:16:58
          Yes, there will. The winning side usually starts off by - GA Tiger MU - 2/23 10:00:02
     Thats overkill, as usual. If anything, increase penalties - GA Tiger MU - 2/23 09:56:03
          Libbies used it against anti-abortion protests - Spanky KU - 2/23 10:01:34
     So I should just start a company that show's up at - catbirdseat MU - 2/23 09:53:37
     That is damned fine.(nm) - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/23 09:51:01
          Lol. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/23 09:53:20
          of course (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 2/23 09:52:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard