Welcome Guest

I have repeatedly stated his was a "Private talk."

Posted on: February 20, 2017 at 15:23:41 CT

tjwheeler UI

Posts:

49220

Member For:

23.63 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Obviously, he works for the US Govt and is a public employee.

He wasn't on the clock. This was a PRIVATE TALK meaning it was NOT PART OF HIS JOB.

Let me know if you want me to repeat this again for you.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Well oiled machine continues to roll along - JG A - 2/20 13:54:48

RE: Well oiled machine continues to roll along - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 2/20 15:40:07

I am crushed he had to go back to his old job. - tman KC - 2/20 13:58:33

"at a PRIVATE talk" - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 13:59:51

So what is his lawyer's basis for action - tman KC - 2/20 14:01:59

Article said he was fired, right? - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:04:34

what reason does one require to fire someone where - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:08:21

So, you're asking about any job in the entire state? - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:11:31

lol - which beliefs are those? which did this guy - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:12:47

I'm not really his lawyer. Therefore, I don't know the - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:19:14

Again - on what basis does it "look like a good case" -what - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:21:19

Sigh. Based on "PRIVATE" talk. Based on the article linked.* - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:25:26

private talk isn't a basis, tj. good grief, just admit - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:43:54

So, you're saying criticizing the POTUS privately is - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:06:53

Nailed it(nm) - tman KC - 2/20 15:01:58

I'd love to be Craig's lawyer - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 13:58:05

Insubordination(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 2/20 14:32:27

How? Having a personal opinion at a private talk is - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:33:00

You're the fool on this as usual. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/20 14:49:24

No, he's a public sector employee and his private - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:07:41

You broadcast your failure again. He wasn't "private". - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/20 15:17:03

I have repeatedly stated his was a "Private talk." - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:23:41

lol why would you love to be his lawyer?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/20 14:03:17

Clearly, I think he's got a good case for wrongful - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:12:38

lol on what basis?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/20 14:15:43

Answered above(nm) - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:20:25

You didn't answer. But hey if it felt good that is lib - tman KC - 2/20 15:03:27

I've answered it multiple times in this thread.(nm) - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:08:36

no it isn't (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:21:33

what case specifically does he have, tj? You're dodging - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:13:30

Based on the same article you read. - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:20:13

what basis, tj? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:25:21

For the 4th time: "PRIVATE talk" and the article linked - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:27:04

So if I tell you a discussion is private but yet it gets - tman KC - 2/20 15:04:47

you're really doing well providing the legal basis, please, - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:52:12

b/c then he might know the law, i'm guessing? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:09:08

What is your legal basis? - tman KC - 2/20 13:59:15