Welcome Guest

what reason does one require to fire someone where

Posted on: February 20, 2017 at 14:08:21 CT

90Tiger STL

Posts:

166041

Member For:

23.52 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

you live?

at my employer it's "we don't want you any more".

EDIT: and you didn't answer his question.

Edited by 90Tiger at 14:08:36 on 02/20/17

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Well oiled machine continues to roll along - JG MU

- 2/20 13:54:48

RE: Well oiled machine continues to roll along - JayHoaxH8r MU

- 2/20 15:40:07

I am crushed he had to go back to his old job. - tman KC - 2/20 13:58:33

"at a PRIVATE talk" - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 13:59:51

So what is his lawyer's basis for action - tman KC - 2/20 14:01:59

Article said he was fired, right? - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:04:34

what reason does one require to fire someone where - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:08:21

So, you're asking about any job in the entire state? - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:11:31

lol - which beliefs are those? which did this guy - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:12:47

I'm not really his lawyer. Therefore, I don't know the - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:19:14

Again - on what basis does it "look like a good case" -what - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:21:19

Sigh. Based on "PRIVATE" talk. Based on the article linked.* - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:25:26

private talk isn't a basis, tj. good grief, just admit - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:43:54

So, you're saying criticizing the POTUS privately is - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:06:53

Nailed it(nm) - tman KC - 2/20 15:01:58

I'd love to be Craig's lawyer - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 13:58:05

Insubordination(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 2/20 14:32:27

How? Having a personal opinion at a private talk is - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:33:00

You're the fool on this as usual. - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/20 14:49:24

No, he's a public sector employee and his private - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:07:41

You broadcast your failure again. He wasn't "private". - RHAYWORTH MU - 2/20 15:17:03

I have repeatedly stated his was a "Private talk." - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:23:41

lol why would you love to be his lawyer?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/20 14:03:17

Clearly, I think he's got a good case for wrongful - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:12:38

lol on what basis?(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 2/20 14:15:43

Answered above(nm) - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:20:25

You didn't answer. But hey if it felt good that is lib - tman KC - 2/20 15:03:27

I've answered it multiple times in this thread.(nm) - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 15:08:36

no it isn't (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:21:33

what case specifically does he have, tj? You're dodging - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:13:30

Based on the same article you read. - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:20:13

what basis, tj? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:25:21

For the 4th time: "PRIVATE talk" and the article linked - tjwheeler UI - 2/20 14:27:04

So if I tell you a discussion is private but yet it gets - tman KC - 2/20 15:04:47

you're really doing well providing the legal basis, please, - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:52:12

b/c then he might know the law, i'm guessing? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:09:08

What is your legal basis? - tman KC - 2/20 13:59:15