Welcome Guest

yes and if someone has a history of the same implication

Posted on: February 20, 2017 at 14:54:00 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
151576
Member For:
22.59 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
1000/1000 times, I generally consider it here.

Especially when he didn't refute it.

You're being literal here in place of reasonable and hence "picklesque".

It's disappointing.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     here pickle - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/20 14:07:40
          that's not the Constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 14:16:53
     so all immigration is unconstitutional(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:20:17
          all fed gvmt immigration laws are unconstitutional (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:27:08
               we are all sovereign, there are no citizens, the point is - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:36:17
               all immigration is unconstitutional, it is NOT allowed by - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:29:35
                    No, the Constitution applies to the federal gvmt - pickle MU - 2/20 13:37:38
                         so fed laws about murder or drugs are unconstitutional(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:53:45
                              Calling something "unconstitutional" is not akin to calling - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:03:19
                                   is that what you think pickle is implying, an innocuous - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:10:34
                                        I have no idea what he is implying. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:12:53
                                             Then your deductive reasoning skills and pattern - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:14:17
                                                  Implications are subjective. - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:14:57
                                                       yes and if someone has a history of the same implication - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:54:00
                              now you get it (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:02:20
                              Correct (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:57:56
                              Absolutely, yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 13:54:29
                                   so "general welfare of the US" means nothing?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:56:51
                                        No, it means something. - ummmm MU - 2/20 13:57:47
                                             god that's picklesque (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:02:47
                                                  How am I supposed to respond to that last post? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:04:13
                                                       by admitting it gives congress broad powers in law writting - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 14:12:37
                                                            none of those things have anything to do with - pickle MU - 2/20 14:20:39
                                                                 it gives congress the power to: - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 14:38:39
                                                                      No, read the clause: - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:40:48
                                                                           so why is naturalization included in the section? - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 14:50:03
                                                                                because section 8 enumerates - pickle MU - 2/20 14:57:42
                                                            That clause gives Congress to lay taxes to provide - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:14:29
                         the constitution doesn't apply to anyone, it's a meaningless - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:38:56
                    given that he thinks the constitution is meaningless, - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:35:37
     Have 10 - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/20 13:19:45
     Neither is the electromagnetic spectrum - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/20 13:03:24
          I want wanna them electromagnetic pulse rifles - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/20 13:24:23
     Neither is semi-automatic or Air Force - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:00:29
          The Air Force is unconstitutional. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 13:58:09
               How about the FAA or the FDA or the - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:06:28
                    FAA and FDA, yes - pickle MU - 2/20 14:22:50
                    What about the FFA? - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/20 14:10:23
                    All unconstitutional. - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:08:14
                         Commerce Clause - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:11:48
                              The commerce clause is about facilitating free trade - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:12:19
                                   Interstate commerce - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:16:23
                                        RE: Interstate commerce - pickle MU - 2/20 14:24:03
                                        Yes, "regulate" as in make regular - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:19:37
                                             you're out - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:20:56
                                                  What exactly have you done? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:23:51
          Wait, A lib that knows the difference between a semi auto - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/20 13:13:33
               It's a double handle (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:17:23
                    What does that mean? And you avoid explaining how - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:29:16
                         I already explained it to you the other day (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:38:11
                              The words never appear - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:45:04
                                   arms(aments) is in the second amendment - pickle MU - 2/20 13:48:24
                                        doesn't dead document mean it meant what the words - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:03:29
                                             Yes, the words and phrases as they were understood - pickle MU - 2/20 14:08:10
                                                  which in no manner of consideration could have possibly - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:11:40
                                                       lmfao (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 14:24:41
                                        It did not exist at the time the constitution as written - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:59:14
                                             That is irrelevant - pickle MU - 2/20 14:05:20
                                                  No - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:07:26
                                                       i never said i was an authority (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 14:28:10
                    Im quite sure it is - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/20 13:20:57
          Armaments (arms) is in the Constitution - pickle MU - 2/20 13:12:56
               not what he said (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:13:55
     Article 1, Section 8, clause 4 - Spanky KU - 2/20 12:54:17
          The subject is immigration, not naturalization - pickle MU - 2/20 13:11:56
               One cannot be naturalized without being an immigrant - Spanky KU - 2/20 13:20:39
                    The subject is immigration, not naturalization - pickle MU - 2/20 13:26:20
                         One cannot Naturalize without being an immigrant. - Spanky KU - 2/20 14:59:58
                              they are two entirely different things (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 15:04:02
                                   Nope... They are not - Spanky KU - 2/20 15:28:28
                                        lol. Ok, Spanky (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 15:33:10
                    I guess congress could have written the naturalization laws - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:23:55
          why not? - SwampTiger MU - 2/20 12:57:20
               Why would they? - Spanky KU - 2/20 13:06:32
                    idk crudup, why (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 2/20 13:10:28
     Yes, it is...You're just not able to read and comprehend (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 2/20 12:53:30
          The words "immigration" and immigrant do not appear at all - pickle MU - 2/20 13:11:22
               no, but migration does(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:34:32
     neat (nm) - Sal KC - 2/20 12:53:22




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard