Welcome Guest

I guess congress could have written the naturalization laws

Posted on: February 20, 2017 at 13:23:55 CT
tigerinhogtown STL
Posts:
62834
Member For:
23.60 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
requiring one to become a citizen before moving to the US. Would they still be considered immigrants then?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     here pickle - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/20 14:07:40
          that's not the Constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 14:16:53
     so all immigration is unconstitutional(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:20:17
          all fed gvmt immigration laws are unconstitutional (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:27:08
               we are all sovereign, there are no citizens, the point is - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:36:17
               all immigration is unconstitutional, it is NOT allowed by - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:29:35
                    No, the Constitution applies to the federal gvmt - pickle MU - 2/20 13:37:38
                         so fed laws about murder or drugs are unconstitutional(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:53:45
                              Calling something "unconstitutional" is not akin to calling - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:03:19
                                   is that what you think pickle is implying, an innocuous - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:10:34
                                        I have no idea what he is implying. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:12:53
                                             Then your deductive reasoning skills and pattern - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:14:17
                                                  Implications are subjective. - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:14:57
                                                       yes and if someone has a history of the same implication - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:54:00
                              now you get it (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:02:20
                              Correct (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:57:56
                              Absolutely, yes. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 13:54:29
                                   so "general welfare of the US" means nothing?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:56:51
                                        No, it means something. - ummmm MU - 2/20 13:57:47
                                             god that's picklesque (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:02:47
                                                  How am I supposed to respond to that last post? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:04:13
                                                       by admitting it gives congress broad powers in law writting - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 14:12:37
                                                            none of those things have anything to do with - pickle MU - 2/20 14:20:39
                                                                 it gives congress the power to: - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 14:38:39
                                                                      No, read the clause: - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:40:48
                                                                           so why is naturalization included in the section? - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 14:50:03
                                                                                because section 8 enumerates - pickle MU - 2/20 14:57:42
                                                            That clause gives Congress to lay taxes to provide - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:14:29
                         the constitution doesn't apply to anyone, it's a meaningless - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:38:56
                    given that he thinks the constitution is meaningless, - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:35:37
     Have 10 - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/20 13:19:45
     Neither is the electromagnetic spectrum - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/20 13:03:24
          I want wanna them electromagnetic pulse rifles - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/20 13:24:23
     Neither is semi-automatic or Air Force - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:00:29
          The Air Force is unconstitutional. (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 13:58:09
               How about the FAA or the FDA or the - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:06:28
                    FAA and FDA, yes - pickle MU - 2/20 14:22:50
                    What about the FFA? - Tigrrrr! MU - 2/20 14:10:23
                    All unconstitutional. - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:08:14
                         Commerce Clause - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:11:48
                              The commerce clause is about facilitating free trade - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:12:19
                                   Interstate commerce - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:16:23
                                        RE: Interstate commerce - pickle MU - 2/20 14:24:03
                                        Yes, "regulate" as in make regular - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:19:37
                                             you're out - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:20:56
                                                  What exactly have you done? (nm) - ummmm MU - 2/20 14:23:51
          Wait, A lib that knows the difference between a semi auto - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/20 13:13:33
               It's a double handle (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:17:23
                    What does that mean? And you avoid explaining how - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:29:16
                         I already explained it to you the other day (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 13:38:11
                              The words never appear - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:45:04
                                   arms(aments) is in the second amendment - pickle MU - 2/20 13:48:24
                                        doesn't dead document mean it meant what the words - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:03:29
                                             Yes, the words and phrases as they were understood - pickle MU - 2/20 14:08:10
                                                  which in no manner of consideration could have possibly - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 14:11:40
                                                       lmfao (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 14:24:41
                                        It did not exist at the time the constitution as written - Tesla MU - 2/20 13:59:14
                                             That is irrelevant - pickle MU - 2/20 14:05:20
                                                  No - Tesla MU - 2/20 14:07:26
                                                       i never said i was an authority (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 14:28:10
                    Im quite sure it is - Uncle Fester USMC - 2/20 13:20:57
          Armaments (arms) is in the Constitution - pickle MU - 2/20 13:12:56
               not what he said (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/20 13:13:55
     Article 1, Section 8, clause 4 - Spanky KU - 2/20 12:54:17
          The subject is immigration, not naturalization - pickle MU - 2/20 13:11:56
               One cannot be naturalized without being an immigrant - Spanky KU - 2/20 13:20:39
                    The subject is immigration, not naturalization - pickle MU - 2/20 13:26:20
                         One cannot Naturalize without being an immigrant. - Spanky KU - 2/20 14:59:58
                              they are two entirely different things (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 15:04:02
                                   Nope... They are not - Spanky KU - 2/20 15:28:28
                                        lol. Ok, Spanky (nm) - pickle MU - 2/20 15:33:10
                    I guess congress could have written the naturalization laws - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:23:55
          why not? - SwampTiger MU - 2/20 12:57:20
               Why would they? - Spanky KU - 2/20 13:06:32
                    idk crudup, why (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 2/20 13:10:28
     Yes, it is...You're just not able to read and comprehend (nm) - Salty Dog MU - 2/20 12:53:30
          The words "immigration" and immigrant do not appear at all - pickle MU - 2/20 13:11:22
               no, but migration does(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 2/20 13:34:32
     neat (nm) - Sal KC - 2/20 12:53:22




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard