Welcome Guest

Unless they don't believe that the lower courts

Posted on: February 7, 2017 at 08:52:27 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
51160
Member For:
16.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
reasoning for the injunction was sound. They may disagree with the lower courts ruling that the plaintiffs would likely win. That would throw the reason for the injunction out.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

TB Liberal Legal Scholars - - 90Tiger ATL - 2/7 07:32:51
     what is the issue before the 9th circuit? - gmmm98 MU - 2/7 08:17:14
          I think so. They cannot rule on the case itself since it - DHighlander KC - 2/7 08:18:35
               the standing issue is interesting - gmmm98 MU - 2/7 08:30:24
                    Unless they don't believe that the lower courts - DHighlander KC - 2/7 08:52:27
     It's immoral - pickle MU - 2/7 08:03:44
          to you, yes. to me, no. having borders is immoral - 90Tiger ATL - 2/7 09:02:21
               having borders is not immoral to me - pickle MU - 2/7 10:08:05
     Constitution and its amendments supersede statute - Doc James USA - 2/7 07:46:05
          No the first sentence in his post clearly addressed that. - DHighlander KC - 2/7 07:54:38
               You're the Constitutionalist around here - pickle MU - 2/7 08:15:13
                    Has it been declared unconstitutional by the courts? - DHighlander KC - 2/7 08:17:41
                         Avoiding my question - pickle MU - 2/7 08:43:36
                              Actually, I think you have changed your question. - Doc James USA - 2/7 08:57:24
                         Has there been a case or controversy to date?(nm) - Doc James USA - 2/7 08:18:44
     We are talking about the 9th circuit. Social agenda is much - DHighlander KC - 2/7 07:40:28




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard