Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

First, you didn't answer the question

Posted on: February 3, 2017 at 10:22:19 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
267340
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Property rights are natural rights, not "civil" rights; they cannot be taken away. Also, "citizens" is irrelevant here.

What does "shall not be infringed" mean?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

US House votes to overturn rule from Obama - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:05:23
     JG, is this you? eerily similar posting patterns (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/3 10:28:09
     They need them 'cause their arms get tired throwing rocks at - Emoji Man MSU - 2/3 10:20:07
     more dishonesty from you. It's all you have (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/3 10:18:45
          Dishonesty? - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:21:15
               dishonesty by omission and intent, yes. of course - 90Tiger MU - 2/3 10:27:48
                    He issued the rule over a year ago. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:28:26
                         no..he didn't. It was issued in the last 60 days - Spanky KU - 2/3 10:30:45
     Why can't you tell the truth? The rule Obama issued in his - Spanky KU - 2/3 10:15:46
          This is not what I'm talking about. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:22:22
               That is what the rule that the House overturned says - Spanky KU - 2/3 10:24:14
                    RE: That is what the rule that the House overturned says - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:24:45
                         when will you learn NPR is not a trustworthy source.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:41:01
                              The same day you learn infowars is not a trustworthy - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:42:02
                         thats not what the rule says... I summarized it - Spanky KU - 2/3 10:29:29
     Let's assume for a moment gvmt is legitimate - pickle MU - 2/3 10:15:32
          The rights of citizens shall not be infringed - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:18:12
               First, you didn't answer the question - pickle MU - 2/3 10:22:19
                    I like that you use the language of the constitution - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:23:11
                         But you think it's legitimate. Dodge and deflect. - pickle MU - 2/3 10:29:18
                              It shall not be taken away. I get it. - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:30:29
                                   That's not what it means - pickle MU - 2/3 10:34:26
                                        When a felon loses their rights to own a gun - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:38:35
                                             Felons don't lose rights; they are not taken away - pickle MU - 2/3 10:54:52
                         a gun is property and property is a natural right (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/3 10:29:14
               That's as funny as thinking you support the first amendment - 90Tiger MU - 2/3 10:19:51
     The problem is who decides a person is mentally ill - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:10:36
          extreme vetting!(nm) - gmmm98 MU - 2/3 10:11:07
          I think liberals are mentally ill. Go guns for them!!(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:11:02
               Trump tries to help them and they say NO THANKS!(nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:12:29
     psychiatry is a cult of death, almost all mental illness can - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 2/3 10:08:23
          RE: psychiatry is a cult of death, almost all mental illness can - sarasotatiger MU - 2/3 10:31:14
          I know I sleep better with a Ruger under my pillow. So, I - Emoji Man MSU - 2/3 10:13:50
          Where do you get that information? I need to know.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 2/3 10:12:04
          Along with large payments to a California church. - Emoji Man MSU - 2/3 10:09:29
          Are you a Scientologist? (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:08:45
     What kind of gun will you get? - Emoji Man MSU - 2/3 10:08:16
     What is the definition of severely mentally ill? - Fred G. Sanford USA - 2/3 10:07:16
          Anyone who hasn't conquered their thetans. 👻 - Emoji Man MSU - 2/3 10:21:48
          yes, that's the issue. Not to mention that even crazy - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:09:02
               Crazy people needs guns too - tigerdb MU - 2/3 10:15:45
                    Didnt he steal that gun?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:16:52
                         sandy hook never happened - tigerdb MU - 2/3 10:19:14
                              Im not one of those people so what is your point?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:20:08
                                   People that are mentally ill should not be packing heat - tigerdb MU - 2/3 10:22:44
                                        Why not just make it illegal to randomly shoot people? - Emoji Man MSU - 2/3 10:44:32
                                        Because they have a right to defend themselves just like - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:24:24
                         Adam Lanza then (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:18:40
                              so the law wouldnt have prevented him from shooting - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:19:35
          RE: What is the definition of severely mentally ill? - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:08:15
               What is the definition in the law? - Fred G. Sanford USA - 2/3 10:16:30
               They also consider mild autism, aspergers, etc. - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:11:49
                    NP, just label everyone mentally ill. No more guns. - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:13:13
                         hell yes they would.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:22:11
                         They're gonna take our guns!!! (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:14:18
                              Many freely admit that doing away with the 2nd - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:15:07
                                   I'm not one of those people (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:25:21
                                        Then why do you believe the propaganda from those that - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:28:07
                                             I think it should be more difficult to get a gun - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:29:08
                                                  Then you are for getting rid of the 2nd amendment(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:33:49
                                   aka hillary clinton.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:22:26
                    "severe mental illness" - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:12:54
                         and that is subjective, not objective.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 2/3 10:22:45
                              That's from the national institute of health - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:25:57
                                   of course, yes (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 2/3 11:37:01
                         any answer to my question below?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:13:54
               Doesnt that conflict with HIPAA privacy laws?(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:09:41
                    That was the rule they undid today - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:16:26
                         So it did violate the HIPAA laws. (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:17:47
                              I'm not sure of that - MrBlueSky MU - 2/3 10:19:15
                                   It was designed to circumvent the 2nd amendment and - hefeweizen MU - 2/3 10:21:10




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard