 |
|
Clarification of my position on muzzlum ban. Y'day
Posted on: February 1, 2017 at 13:14:55 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68139
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
i said it is clearly a ban on muzzlums entering the country.
IMO, the bad guys are the muzz. Not coptic christians or whoever else is there. I said the administration came up with an artful way to keep bad guys out...who are muzz, without announcing a ban based on religion...or cult.
The intent was and remains to keep bad guys out, and the bad guys are muzz.
In y'day's thread i was appropriately called out by a poster who said that if it were a muzzlum ban, it would affect many more countries. If it were a ban on muzzlums, we would not allow anyone from egypt or indonesia as examples, from entering.
My thanx to the other poster (90?) for pointing out the error in my thinking.
Muzzlums are the reason for the ban because of their acts, but they are not the sole focus of the ban. It is perfectly legit and honest for the administration to say this is not a muzzlum ban.
IMO, the bad guys are the muzz. Not coptic christians or whoever else is there. I said the administration came up with an artful way to keep bad guys out...who are muzz, without announcing a ban based on religion...or cult.
The intent was and remains to keep bad guys out, and the bad guys are muzz.
In y'day's thread i was appropriately called out by a poster who said that if it were a muzzlum ban, it would affect many more countries. If it were a ban on muzzlums, we would not allow anyone from egypt or indonesia as examples, from entering.
My thanx to the other poster (90?) for pointing out the error in my thinking.
Muzzlums are the reason for the ban because of their acts, but they are not the sole focus of the ban. It is perfectly legit and honest for the administration to say this is not a muzzlum ban.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Clarification of my position on muzzlum ban. Y'day - hokie VT - 2/1 13:14:55
-