Welcome Guest

Published in Nature , but not peer reviewed?

Posted on: January 4, 2017 at 11:57:32 CT

JG MU

Posts:

257025

Member For:

21.67 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

govt busted lying about GMO crops again - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 11:31:21

what's the lie? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 1/4 12:34:40

Published in Nature , but not peer reviewed? - JG MU

- 1/4 11:57:32

It wasn't in Nature. It was published in - Ferg STL - 1/4 12:50:51

Scientific reports is peer-reviewed and is published by the - chigger MU - 1/4 13:10:13

Meant to reply to the hapless Ferg - JG MU

- 1/4 11:57:59

It's not a peer reviewed study - Ferg STL - 1/4 11:55:24

Oh yeah, here is a link proving you wrong about your - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 12:06:34

I guess you were confused when it said it was a peer reviewe - JG MU

- 1/4 12:05:29

He was just trying to discredit the media reporting on - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 12:07:04

thats so Ferg - JG MU

- 1/4 12:14:24

oh and keep in mind, the only ones saying that GMO - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 12:03:00

So you will ignore the data because you don't - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 12:00:59

The source of the money indicates the conclusion - Ferg STL - 1/4 12:08:54

real scientists who haven't been paid off do believe - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 12:10:33

LOL. You funny. - Ferg STL - 1/4 12:14:17

I see you avoided the question. I take it I win.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 12:16:39

winning is much too easy on Tigerboard - JG MU

- 1/4 12:23:50

Fear not. We now have Trump to protect the little - JG MU

- 1/4 11:32:51

well, he is anti GMO so that is good.(nm) - SuperTone MU

- 1/4 11:33:11

Trump candidates for Ag sec - JG MU

- 1/4 11:37:57