Welcome Guest

I wouldn't be talking "principles" if I were you.

Posted on: January 4, 2017 at 10:33:23 CT

ummmm MU

Posts:

44902

Member For:

13.48 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Your position is to defer to whatever the "law" says.

The "law" could be entirely immoral, but you'll still defend it.

That is essentially a principle-less position.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Here's a continuing battle in Ga that needs to be won. - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:10:41

More sexism, more xenophobia, more bigotry (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/4 11:27:51

How did he qualify under DACA anyway? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 1/4 10:24:35

Not only that but the Ga SC has already ruled - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:34:01

Yeah, these are the sort of people you want gone: - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:13:03

Why?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:13:54

You tell me. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:14:11

Tell you what. You made the statement. It - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:16:06

You? Answer questions???? - pickle MU

- 1/4 11:28:38

I don't want productive people like Mr. Santillan to be - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:18:50

How many unproductive people came with him? - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/4 10:27:54

Oh, I see. You're into social justice. - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:30:31

Camps? they cost money. Send them back to mexico on bus - RHAYWORTH MU - 1/4 10:46:32

Buses are free, though (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:49:00

Life's a bltch, ain't it?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:37:47

The judge needs to be gone. As for the plantiff - tman KC - 1/4 10:25:24

Oh no, not the law. (nm) - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:27:54

so typical of you - tman KC - 1/4 10:32:00

No, your lack of willingness to discuss and engage - pickle MU

- 1/4 12:21:22

Thanks for posting (nm) - tman KC - 1/4 12:34:09

Proving my point (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/4 12:47:01

Thanks for posting - tman KC - 1/4 12:54:53

I wouldn't be talking "principles" if I were you. - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:33:23

Principles. I will talk about them while you - tman KC - 1/4 10:40:31

If its "immoral" (which is meaningless in law) then - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:36:38

That's what I'm trying to do! To get people to agree to - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:37:52

And that must mean that laws should NOT be changed. - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:41:57

The fact that a law can be changed is the moot point. - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:49:57

And until they are changed a judge should follow them - tman KC - 1/4 11:03:52

Whatever you do - pickle MU

- 1/4 12:23:31

Thanks for posting(nm) - tman KC - 1/4 12:34:56

Any particular situation should NOT preclude existing law. - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:21:49

It's a dumb law. - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:27:43

Meaning...there is no limit on who and how many - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 10:39:15

There is a limit. - ummmm MU - 1/4 10:50:32

Which, of course, is a meaningless distinction.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 1/4 11:32:32

Which means it's over your head (nm) - pickle MU

- 1/4 12:24:38

That is not for the judge to decide - tman KC - 1/4 10:30:09

RE: Here's a continuing battle in Ga that needs to be won. - SwampTiger MU - 1/4 10:12:56