I explain them in the correct way. When you or others
Posted on: December 27, 2016 at 16:53:53 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44833
Member For:
12.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
disagree with my definition, you're not disagreeing with me personally. You're disagreeing with the pre-existing concept of natural rights.
"why does the random collection of atoms that make up ummmm have natural rights that a random collection of atoms that make up a cockroach does not have?"
Cockroaches have their own separate and distinct nature from humans. Is this even a controversial statement?
Why would it not be immoral for a random collection of atoms that make up a rock to crush a random collection of atoms that make up the random collection of atoms that make up 'pickle', but it *would* be immoral for the random collection of atoms making up ummmm to crush the random collection of pickle atoms?
Same thing. Rocks have a different nature than humans. Humans have a unique nature to humans. This is a pretty bizarre angle you are taking, Jeff
Edited by ummmm at 16:56:31 on 12/27/16