 |
|
I consider both labels a dead end.
Posted on: December 4, 2016 at 19:05:01 CT
RayKinsella1922 SEC
Posts:
26858
Member For:
9.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Logical and philosophical proofs are only needed when scientific proofs are non-existent or currently failing.
Scientific proofs fail when logical and philosophical proofs are completely dismissed.
All must be in play, but if the starting point is: I have no idea THAT I am, there is no need to continue. The resulting philosophy and 'logic' and 'science' will be a dead end.
If the starting point is: I AM, then just that awareness will inform the scientific, philosophical and logical proofs, such is the massive number of awarenesses that flow from 'I AM'.
Always the discussion seems to involve 'GOD' & 'GOOD' & 'EVIL' and on and on.
Rarely does the discussion start with WHAT is doing the discussing, but without that tied down, it's another dead end.
Edited by RayKinsella1922 at 20:25:00 on 12/04/16
Scientific proofs fail when logical and philosophical proofs are completely dismissed.
All must be in play, but if the starting point is: I have no idea THAT I am, there is no need to continue. The resulting philosophy and 'logic' and 'science' will be a dead end.
If the starting point is: I AM, then just that awareness will inform the scientific, philosophical and logical proofs, such is the massive number of awarenesses that flow from 'I AM'.
Always the discussion seems to involve 'GOD' & 'GOOD' & 'EVIL' and on and on.
Rarely does the discussion start with WHAT is doing the discussing, but without that tied down, it's another dead end.
Edited by RayKinsella1922 at 20:25:00 on 12/04/16
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
I consider both labels a dead end. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 12/4 19:05:01