it for you:
TheWildcat posted: pickle isn't against child molestation. (nm)
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14316902
You replied: utterly stupid, wildcat, you're better than this (nm)
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14316932
to which I replied: He's personally opposed to child molestation, but thinks that there should be no laws against it, correct?
eg. If a child is a runaway and willingly engages in adult child sex with his/her 'sugardaddy' on that adult's own property, no one should have a right to enter his property and prevent him from doing so, per anarcho-capitalist theory, correct?
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14316954
NOTE: All of this portion of the thread has been about pickle, whose views are all predicated upon anarcho-capitalist theory, of course. In this context, your reply to me was:
90Tiger: no, incorrect. molestation is an infringement and a crime. read posts.
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14316958
JeffB: You are not an anarchist, yet you are defending an anarchist...
90Tiger: this doesnt have anything to do with anarchy, jeff. (nm)
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14317047
---
Me: Come on man. We were discussing pickle and his views here. He is all about anarchy. How can you defend him and his views and say that the discussion "doesnt have anything to do with anarchy"?