claim and either link to some previous post of yours that addressed what I wrote in the post linked to below or respond to it logically, point by point.
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=14316954
To save you the trouble of following that link, however, I will paste it here for you to address line by line in logical fashion:
He's personally opposed to child molestation, but thinks that there should be no laws against it, correct?
eg. If a child is a runaway and willingly engages in adult child sex with his/her 'sugardaddy' on that adult's own property, no one should have a right to enter his property and prevent him from doing so, per anarcho-capitalist theory, correct?