Welcome Guest

Thank you, I was correct.

Posted on: November 15, 2016 at 21:16:27 CT

tiger4real MU

Posts:

17597

Member For:

24.17 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

Cost reduction across the board, with a higher % cut, relative to taxes paid today, for the lowest tax rate earners. (Obviously more dollars for the high earners)

Edited by tiger4real at 21:18:58 on 11/15/16

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Somebody may want to tell Rask & his cohorts that wasteful - STL1DFW STL - 11/15 19:52:11

RE: Somebody may want to tell Rask & his cohorts that wasteful - sarasotatiger MU - 11/15 20:04:03

Way to crack the caper, Dick Tracy... - STL1DFW STL - 11/15 20:44:49

smdh?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 11/15 20:45:25

Huh?(nm) - STL1DFW STL - 11/15 20:50:13

What does that mean in your post?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 11/15 21:01:23

what is Trump's plan on lowering personal income taxes? - tiger4real MU - 11/15 20:02:21

I've heard some chatter about abolishing the IRS. That would - STL1DFW STL - 11/15 20:46:28

That has to be a rumor. Ironically, the IRS is the one of - tiger4real MU - 11/15 21:18:28

Thats ridiculous, and NOT a measure of "efficiency".(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 11/16 07:21:24

Yes to 3 brackets 12, 25, and 33. (nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 11/15 20:12:42

Interesting. So a potential increase for those in the 10%? - tiger4real MU - 11/15 20:16:23

link - DevilsAdvocate MU - 11/15 20:19:19

Thank you, I was correct. - tiger4real MU - 11/15 21:16:27

Depends because the standard deduction is 30000 - DevilsAdvocate MU - 11/15 20:18:13

he has no idea what the public/private approach is that - 90Tiger MU - 11/15 19:54:10