Welcome Guest

which part was not MOSTLY bull****? the part where she

Posted on: November 6, 2016 at 17:40:24 CT

blake1771 MU

Posts:

14337

Member For:

19.82 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

repeatedly lied under oath? the part where she violated FOIA? the part where she violated the national records act? the part where she violated 18 USC 793 (e) (f) and (g)?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Who (is dense enough) believes 650,000 emails were analyzed. - MizzouTigerz MU

- 11/6 17:27:43

It was reported only about 1k were huma's. - Toger STL - 11/6 17:53:11

Simple text search would eliminate any emails not - SparkyStalcup MU - 11/6 17:40:31

Simple text search would not constitute examining any emails - MizzouTigerz MU

- 11/6 17:53:04

Can someone remind me why she and/or her aides - MIZ45 MU - 11/6 17:37:46

Dude, the 650 were not Hillary's - raskolnikov MU - 11/6 17:36:40

Did she, or did she not, violate the law by releasing - MizzouTigerz MU

- 11/6 17:55:29

Couldn't tell you (nm) - raskolnikov MU - 11/6 18:00:23

Then you have no business saying she has done nothing wrong. - MizzouTigerz MU

- 11/6 18:14:23

I did not say that - raskolnikov MU - 11/6 19:01:35

which part was not MOSTLY bull****? the part where she - blake1771 KC - 11/6 17:40:24

No charges friend. - raskolnikov MU - 11/6 17:46:54

#1 just b/c she wasn't charged doesn't mean anything. - blake1771 KC - 11/6 18:07:20

Comey said NO basis for charges, not even close - raskolnikov MU - 11/6 19:03:44

How many people reviewed the emails?(nm) - playhard NWMSU - 11/6 17:31:02

Compare time lines to how long the State Depart - tman KC - 11/6 17:39:31