Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

What type of proof would you accept?

Posted on: October 28, 2016 at 10:56:52 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
13.28 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Are you looking for physical proof?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

JG, please answer this question without singing and dancing - pickle MU - 10/28 10:45:58
     ask woddy guthrie(nm) - escalade NWMSU - 10/28 11:31:07
     Why do you believe I can/t haven't answered all your questio - JG A - 10/28 10:48:17
          can I sell my part, can I exercise my property rights since - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 11:01:08
               Yes - JG A - 10/28 11:06:38
                    patently false (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 11:49:06
                         Except its true - JG A - 10/28 12:46:56
                    lmao wut? - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/28 11:15:31
                    That makes no sense at all (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 11:12:49
                         See reply to Tigermatt - JG A - 10/28 11:33:04
                    Correct me if I'm wrong - but doesn't the gov't sell - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:10:48
                         its a republic - JG A - 10/28 11:32:19
                              I think you can do better on this one (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:36:51
                                   They at least axe for public comment - JG A - 10/28 11:39:14
                              Non-answer. More singing and dancing (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 11:34:59
                                   Correct answer and then yes - JG A - 10/28 11:39:37
                    That makes absolutely no f**king sense. (nm) - TigerMatt MU - 10/28 11:08:59
                         To an idiot - JG A - 10/28 11:32:41
          Timestamp. It is owned by all of us? - pickle MU - 10/28 10:51:55
               That would include the Bundys, too. - Alferd Packer MU - 10/28 11:03:38
                    Not include, they are sole owners (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 11:12:18
          RE: Why do you believe I can/t haven't answered all your questio - TigerMatt MU - 10/28 10:49:53
     People don't have natural rights (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 10:47:21
          This is frankly untrue - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:50:31
               Prove it (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 10:54:01
                    They only exist if God exists despite the illogical - Butcher of Bakersfield STL - 10/28 11:23:20
                         One big heaping logical fallacy, MU98 (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 11:25:28
                    Also, in case you didn't see it: - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:57:36
                    What type of proof would you accept? - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:56:52
                         Submit your proof, and I'll evaluate it (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 10:57:24
                              Natural rights are logically deduced. - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:58:16
                                   That's not proof. Prove it (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 10:59:13
                                        Which right do you feel doesn't exist - your right to - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 11:03:01
                                             I have been provided no proof that any natural rights exist - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:04:17
                                                  You are asserting a proof of existence is required fo - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 11:12:53
                                                       LMAO. They exist, because someone made them up? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:16:48
                                                            No, humans observed and acknowledged them (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 11:50:05
                                                                 So natural rights are human constructs? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:51:27
                                                                      Are you reading what I type or just inserting your own words - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 12:26:46
                                                                      No, they are discovered in the same way that many - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:58:10
                                                            Though that is not what he said, a lot of things exist - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:22:38
                                                                 Then what did he say? What proof did he provide - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:26:42
                                                                      He said that natural rights are logically deduced (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:27:15
                                                                           Who determines what is logical? (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:33:07
                                                                                RE: Who determines what is logical? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 12:27:31
                                                                                Logic (nm) - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:42:52
                                        I'm walking you through the logical proof of them. - ummmm MU - 10/28 10:59:48
                                             My life will be taken away from me - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:01:24
                                                  Then you own nothing. Theft does not exist (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 11:19:21
                                                       theft can often be conclusively proven with evidence - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:21:27
                                                            How can theft exist if there are no property rights? - pickle MU - 10/28 11:22:57
                                                                 I will, gladly - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:25:55
                                                                      That's a laydown - pickle MU - 10/28 11:32:50
                                                                           you say natural rights exist. Prove it (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:35:27
                                                                                You're dodging (nm) - pickle MU - 10/28 11:50:53
                                                                                     No, you're dodging (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:54:50
                                                                      You won't allow that to occur because you reject - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:30:59
                                                                           You can't prove the basic premise (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:35:49
                                                                                Premises aren't proven. - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:43:21
                                                  Okay, so then you disagree with the basic premise - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:03:54
                                                       Prove the basic premise - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:05:52
                                                            I can't. It necessitates that you believe - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:17:30
                                                                 So, if I reject your unproven belief, it somehow is evil? - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:24:29
                                                                      Yes, rejecting that each individual has a right to his life - ummmm MU - 10/28 11:28:05
                                                                      The irony in all of this - pickle MU - 10/28 11:27:41
                                                                           It is also ironic that you can't provide proof of natural - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:35:05
                                                  that's called an infringement on your right - the right is - 90Tiger MU - 10/28 11:03:38
                                                       what right is inherent? How is it inherent? What makes it - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/28 11:05:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard