Welcome Guest

True, but consumers wouldn't necessarily benefit

Posted on: October 27, 2016 at 09:51:57 CT
Mo Texan MU
Posts:
20130
Member For:
22.04 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It's a myth that competitive rates would be the result. Insurance companies simply pass the cost along to the consumer via a premium that includes actual claim cost(from a point in time), processing costs and a 10 to 15% profit margin. They have little if any control over the first two items so any rate differential is limited to what profit margin their shareholders will accept.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     I would regulate cost shifting by drug companies - Coors4bob MU - 10/27 09:39:36
     Dog's can't sue people in court for millions.(nm) - Rabbit Test MU - 10/27 09:20:24
          That's not the whole of it, though it is a factor, of course - JeffB MU - 10/27 10:32:13
     I never understood why insurance companies - Sal KC - 10/27 09:07:36
          They can, but must be licensed by the state. States control - Mo Texan MU - 10/27 09:30:37
               I'm guessing they would like gov't - Sal KC - 10/27 09:31:43
                    True, but consumers wouldn't necessarily benefit - Mo Texan MU - 10/27 09:51:57
          RE: I never understood why insurance companies - sarasotatiger MU - 10/27 09:14:48
          six states allowed it - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/27 09:14:18
               lol "federalize the whole system" - Sal KC - 10/27 09:16:09
                    read the article. Six states allowed it. Nobody took them - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/27 09:20:25
                         Nobody took them up because of the legal cluster phuck - Coors4bob MU - 10/27 09:42:19
                              Exactly Bob. And they get standardized, by federalizing (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/27 09:53:44




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard