Welcome Guest

There is no fallacy about you citing Infowars

Posted on: October 20, 2016 at 15:02:22 CT

Webbster MU

Posts:

5035

Member For:

23.80 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

It's complete shyte. It has a wingnut agenda, and you cite it constantly.

You may think you're finding diamonds in coal dust, but no, you're finding gall stones in dung heaps.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Huh? Wapo says Trump won 3rd debate and then - SuperTone MU

- 10/20 12:48:57

Wapo didn't say that, it printed an opinion - Webbster MU - 10/20 12:51:58

Do human beings not write articles for newspapers? (nm) - Sal KC - 10/20 12:54:35

Are human beings newspapers? - Webbster MU - 10/20 13:01:55

do human beings read the newspaper or just wonks?(nm) - tmcats KSU - 10/20 13:04:28

Again - Webbster MU - 10/20 13:05:33

Wapo is the one that chose to post it (nm) - Sal KC - 10/20 13:07:07

Post an opinion by someone not paid by WAPO - Webbster MU - 10/20 13:11:36

If you are trying to prove that Wapo is part of the liberal - JeffB MU

- 10/20 13:21:51

You will read it they way you want to spin it - Webbster MU - 10/20 13:32:05

So I'm a wingnut, but you actively support a woman who - JeffB MU

- 10/20 13:37:54

Yes you are - Webbster MU - 10/20 13:48:26

Links are not much of a discussion. A link to a story - JeffB MU

- 10/20 13:59:56

The sheer fact you cite Infowars - Webbster MU - 10/20 14:20:32

Once again you resort to logical fallacies rather than - JeffB MU

- 10/20 14:39:56

There is no fallacy about you citing Infowars - Webbster MU - 10/20 15:02:22

You mission, should you decide to accept it is to show - JeffB MU

- 10/20 15:12:44

Give it up dude - Webbster MU - 10/20 15:41:39