 |
|
Links are not much of a discussion. A link to a story
Posted on: October 20, 2016 at 13:59:56 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
72262
Member For:
21.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
pointing out a Princeton Professor is expecting some shocking developments next month in the presidential election (this was in September) proves I'm a wingnut?
You are engaging in what one might call prejudice. I link to a story on a site you deem "wingnut" and therefore conclude that I am a "wingnut" by that very fact, completely ignoring the story linked to, and any evidence or opinions therein.
Perhaps you could explain where the Princeton Professor expressed absurd opinions that only a wingnut could believe... and explain why CNN would put such absurd wingnut ideas on their pages.
Or better yet, you could reply to the questions I asked you, namely why YOU shouldn't be considered a wingnut for supporting a woman for president who publicly calls for government funded mass murder with a genocidal, racist bent. Why you do so despite the indisputable evidence that she blatantly and repeatedly lied to the American people, lied to Congress under oath and also told falsehoods to the FBI under oath... and destroyed emails that had been subpoenaed and even destroyed many of the devices themselves. and despite the fact that she has been embroiled in controversy after controversy throughout her many decades in "public service" enriching herself in grand fashion the whole way.
You are engaging in what one might call prejudice. I link to a story on a site you deem "wingnut" and therefore conclude that I am a "wingnut" by that very fact, completely ignoring the story linked to, and any evidence or opinions therein.
Perhaps you could explain where the Princeton Professor expressed absurd opinions that only a wingnut could believe... and explain why CNN would put such absurd wingnut ideas on their pages.
Or better yet, you could reply to the questions I asked you, namely why YOU shouldn't be considered a wingnut for supporting a woman for president who publicly calls for government funded mass murder with a genocidal, racist bent. Why you do so despite the indisputable evidence that she blatantly and repeatedly lied to the American people, lied to Congress under oath and also told falsehoods to the FBI under oath... and destroyed emails that had been subpoenaed and even destroyed many of the devices themselves. and despite the fact that she has been embroiled in controversy after controversy throughout her many decades in "public service" enriching herself in grand fashion the whole way.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Links are not much of a discussion. A link to a story - JeffB MU - 10/20 13:59:56