Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

You are saying there have never been objective

Posted on: October 17, 2016 at 13:14:24 CT
SuperTone MU
Posts:
128107
Member For:
23.71 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
journalists and that just isn't true. They may not have been common but they did exist.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

When just about every newspaper & magazine in the US - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:43:16
     Journalism is dead. Endorsing is a conflict of interest - SuperTone MU - 10/17 12:48:44
          That's simply untrue - pickle MU - 10/17 13:06:35
               You are saying there have never been objective - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:14:24
                    No, that's you putting words in my mouth (nm) - pickle MU - 10/17 13:35:07
                         "never existed." Your words. not mine.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:45:09
                              "an ideal that never existed". Be honest, Tone - pickle MU - 10/17 13:51:31
          Newspapers have been endorsing candidates since least 1960 - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 12:59:43
               you can't endorse and maintain objectivity... - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:13:36
                    It's an editorial board's endorsement. Not the - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 13:20:40
                         it is still an entity whose job is to be objective - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:34:37
                              It is an editorial you dimwit - meatiger MU - 10/17 13:42:21
                                   I'm talking actual papers with official endorsements - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:44:49
                                        the "papers" do not make the endorsements - meatiger MU - 10/17 13:49:31
                                             RE: the "papers" do not make the endorsements - 90Tiger MU - 10/17 13:59:44
                                             A distinction without a difference (nm) - pickle MU - 10/17 13:56:40
                              You have a gross misunderstanding of journalism - pickle MU - 10/17 13:36:26
               you mean 1860 (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 13:12:13
          Then it's always been dead - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:51:47
               The collusion and working hand in hand with a candidate to - JeffB MU - 10/17 12:59:21
                    i don't think it is new, just not as widespread - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:14:51
                    No it isn't - pickle MU - 10/17 13:07:12
                    I'm finding the majority of Americans have no idea how - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 13:02:30
                         Are you on the board of any of these media conglomerates? - JeffB MU - 10/17 13:25:08
     yes?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/17 12:48:03
     Given that 90% of the media is owned by 6 corporations - JeffB MU - 10/17 12:47:41
          if you know media at all, ownership has very little to do - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 12:58:22
               So why bring up your assertion that blacks don't reject God - JeffB MU - 10/17 15:22:37
               Uhh yea. Given what we have ready about the New York Times - TheWildcat STL - 10/17 13:05:03
                    hahahahaha here we go... NYT does it, so ALL media does it - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 13:07:38
                    RE: Uhh yea. Given what we have ready about the New York Times - markymarksthirdnipple STL - 10/17 13:06:49
          That's what De-Regulation gets you - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:48:37
               you actually claiming the media was regulated?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/17 12:52:23
                    "Fat Drunk and Stupid is no way to go through life son"(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:53:37
                         there's a typical HRC response(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/17 13:06:06
                              Bill Clinton signed a bill, ya moron, easing ownership regs - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 14:33:28
     I'll take Unelectable dumb ass for $400 Alex"(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:46:25
     pretty interesting that every 4 years one party, according t - 90Tiger MU - 10/17 12:45:44
          the difference this year is the conservative newspapers - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:49:09
               Trump is no conservative, neither is the hag(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/17 12:51:19
                    which is why it is odd for conservative newspapers to - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:52:28
          No they don't - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:47:40
               lol, you are shameless(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/17 12:48:17
          lol so spot on(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/17 12:47:28
          but that's different, you see (nm) - Sal KC - 10/17 12:46:15
     Why should newspapers and magazines endorse anybody? - Sal KC - 10/17 12:44:03
          Why shouldn't they? It's that pesky 1st amendment - tigerman81 MU - 10/17 12:49:02
               I never said anything about them violating - Sal KC - 10/17 13:03:05
          Newspapers have been doing it since at least 1860 (nm) - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 12:46:55
          Private entities, they can endorse or not endorse as they - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:46:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard