Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Private entities, they can endorse or not endorse as they

Posted on: October 17, 2016 at 12:46:14 CT
TigerJackSwartz MU
Posts:
64229
Member For:
17.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
please, and suffer the consequences of electing to do either.

and you can care, or not care, as you please as well
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

When just about every newspaper & magazine in the US - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:43:16
     Journalism is dead. Endorsing is a conflict of interest - SuperTone MU - 10/17 12:48:44
          That's simply untrue - pickle MU - 10/17 13:06:35
               You are saying there have never been objective - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:14:24
                    No, that's you putting words in my mouth (nm) - pickle MU - 10/17 13:35:07
                         "never existed." Your words. not mine.(nm) - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:45:09
                              "an ideal that never existed". Be honest, Tone - pickle MU - 10/17 13:51:31
          Newspapers have been endorsing candidates since least 1960 - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 12:59:43
               you can't endorse and maintain objectivity... - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:13:36
                    It's an editorial board's endorsement. Not the - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 13:20:40
                         it is still an entity whose job is to be objective - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:34:37
                              It is an editorial you dimwit - meatiger MU - 10/17 13:42:21
                                   I'm talking actual papers with official endorsements - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:44:49
                                        the "papers" do not make the endorsements - meatiger MU - 10/17 13:49:31
                                             RE: the "papers" do not make the endorsements - 90Tiger MU - 10/17 13:59:44
                                             A distinction without a difference (nm) - pickle MU - 10/17 13:56:40
                              You have a gross misunderstanding of journalism - pickle MU - 10/17 13:36:26
               you mean 1860 (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 13:12:13
          Then it's always been dead - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:51:47
               The collusion and working hand in hand with a candidate to - JeffB MU - 10/17 12:59:21
                    i don't think it is new, just not as widespread - SuperTone MU - 10/17 13:14:51
                    No it isn't - pickle MU - 10/17 13:07:12
                    I'm finding the majority of Americans have no idea how - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 13:02:30
                         Are you on the board of any of these media conglomerates? - JeffB MU - 10/17 13:25:08
     yes?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/17 12:48:03
     Given that 90% of the media is owned by 6 corporations - JeffB MU - 10/17 12:47:41
          if you know media at all, ownership has very little to do - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 12:58:22
               So why bring up your assertion that blacks don't reject God - JeffB MU - 10/17 15:22:37
               Uhh yea. Given what we have ready about the New York Times - TheWildcat STL - 10/17 13:05:03
                    hahahahaha here we go... NYT does it, so ALL media does it - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 13:07:38
                    RE: Uhh yea. Given what we have ready about the New York Times - markymarksthirdnipple STL - 10/17 13:06:49
          That's what De-Regulation gets you - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:48:37
               you actually claiming the media was regulated?(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/17 12:52:23
                    "Fat Drunk and Stupid is no way to go through life son"(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:53:37
                         there's a typical HRC response(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 10/17 13:06:06
                              Bill Clinton signed a bill, ya moron, easing ownership regs - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 14:33:28
     I'll take Unelectable dumb ass for $400 Alex"(nm) - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:46:25
     pretty interesting that every 4 years one party, according t - 90Tiger MU - 10/17 12:45:44
          the difference this year is the conservative newspapers - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:49:09
               Trump is no conservative, neither is the hag(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/17 12:51:19
                    which is why it is odd for conservative newspapers to - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:52:28
          No they don't - raskolnikov MU - 10/17 12:47:40
               lol, you are shameless(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 10/17 12:48:17
          lol so spot on(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 10/17 12:47:28
          but that's different, you see (nm) - Sal KC - 10/17 12:46:15
     Why should newspapers and magazines endorse anybody? - Sal KC - 10/17 12:44:03
          Why shouldn't they? It's that pesky 1st amendment - tigerman81 MU - 10/17 12:49:02
               I never said anything about them violating - Sal KC - 10/17 13:03:05
          Newspapers have been doing it since at least 1860 (nm) - Hbombtiger STL - 10/17 12:46:55
          Private entities, they can endorse or not endorse as they - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/17 12:46:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard