Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Regardless, 340+ isn't typical.

Posted on: September 1, 2016 at 13:54:25 CT
zodiac6 JC
Posts:
83015
Member For:
24.09 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It's rare.

Guys who can carry that weight and still maintain the athleticism to be effective are not common at all.

And to the original point, WVU's defensive line isn't really undersized. They may not have IDEAL size, but it's not like they're small.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Comparing Offensive and Defensive lines - samclemens MU - 9/1 11:40:48
     Is this the biggest team we've ever started?(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 9/1 14:27:45
     isn't that fairly typical, even in the NFL - Joeboo MU - 9/1 11:41:40
          WVU plays a 3-3-5 - Bobk MU - 9/1 12:03:02
               I wouldn't call 340+ "typical" - zodiac6 JC - 9/1 12:24:56
                    I named 8 yesterday off the top of my head that are 332+ - Bobk MU - 9/1 12:46:08
                         RE: I named 8 yesterday off the top of my head that are 332+ - zodiac6 JC - 9/1 13:31:27
                              Raji is only taking off 2016 due to his mother's illness - Bobk MU - 9/1 13:46:08
                                   Regardless, 340+ isn't typical. - zodiac6 JC - 9/1 13:54:25
               Hope we bull rush and double team their NT all day long - samclemens MU - 9/1 12:06:33
                    Best way to negate a teams speed & quickness - Nohawks KC - 9/1 12:17:08
                         The thing I am most excited to see out of this team is the - alwaysright MU - 9/1 13:28:03
                              Thats where the suspense is for me - Nohawks KC - 9/1 14:22:52
          We outweigh them on both sides of the ball - samclemens MU - 9/1 11:50:38




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard