Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

yes, Perez is the only untouchable player

Posted on: July 25, 2016 at 09:47:15 CT
Joeboo MU
Posts:
156612
Member For:
20.98 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the Royals have. He's a potential future HOFer, no one else is(at least from what they've shown up to this point)
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Would anyone be against the Royals trading Hosmer? nm - Butman KC - 7/25 09:28:11
     The only tradable pieces are guys that have replacements for - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:51:19
     I would, hate seeing teams trade away the guys - FIJItiger MU - 7/25 09:31:56
     there's still a good window for `17, just cut bait for this - dangertim MU - 7/25 09:31:28
          no, no, no. - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:45:44
               volquez is a FA next year. that's why they should trade - dangertim MU - 7/25 09:49:48
                    I thought the Royals have an option for next year on him?(nm) - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:52:14
                         it's a mutual option, and I think it's a big number. - dangertim MU - 7/25 09:55:01
                              number wasn't as big as I thought. - dangertim MU - 7/25 09:56:33
     Wife and I were just talking about this last night. No, - hefeweizen MU - 7/25 09:31:05
          It's Hosmer>Cain - o'lineydisciple MU - 7/25 12:29:54
          Esky is not a franchise player - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:43:35
          its Salvy and no one else - morry KC - 7/25 09:34:48
               yes, Perez is the only untouchable player - Joeboo MU - 7/25 09:47:15
                    Starting pitchers such as Ventura, Duffy, Kennedy, and - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:48:48
          Gordon? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 09:32:57
          gordon is not a franchise player nm - Butman KC - 7/25 09:31:29
               The contract he signed says ofherwise(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 7/25 09:33:00
                    The contract he signed doesn't make him a franchise - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 09:34:27
                         Highest paid contract in franchise history - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:44:22
                              "very expensive veteran" or "bad contract" would also - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 09:52:16
                                   It is neither of those things. - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 09:55:23
                                        You don't build outfields around 32 year old Left Fielders. - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 10:13:32
                                             Yes, discussions with you in the past make it quite clear - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 10:22:26
                                                  Matt Holliday isn't a Cards' franchise player starting - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 11:49:50
                                                       He was 4 years ago when he was a 32 year-old left fielder. - kmawv8 MU - 7/25 11:56:49
                         It does when it comes to being able to trade him(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 7/25 09:35:19
                              You're using the wrong term then. The term you're looking f - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 09:37:39
                                   The organization considers him franchise. My opinion really - hefeweizen MU - 7/25 09:43:59
                                        Then the organization is also wrong in their assessment. If - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 09:51:01
     not if we could get a true #1 ace that has multiple years - Joeboo MU - 7/25 09:29:14
          if any GM traded an ace for hosmer he would be - ajpe53 MU - 7/25 09:30:59
               yeah, but it's the white sox. they are dumb. - dangertim MU - 7/25 09:32:34
                    that's not ever, ever, ever going to happen - let alone in - 90Tiger MU - 7/25 09:33:42
                         RE: that's not ever, ever, ever going to happen - let alone in - dangertim MU - 7/25 09:37:51
     yes - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/25 09:29:10




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard