 |
|
it was an endorsement of the party platform. Which was a
Posted on: July 21, 2016 at 17:20:00 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
49238
Member For:
16.40 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
tacit endorsement of the guy at the top of the ticket. Trump may not be your guy, he definitely was not mine, but you either endorse him or you are saying to vote for HRC in our two party system. I don't want to hear about third party candidates none are viable at this time.
What the GOP hardliners are failing to realize is that this is not just Trump or HRC. The next president may nominate as many as four SC judges. Trump or HRC are both likely to be horrid presidents but the winner may set the course of our country for the next twenty years with their court appointments.
So the GOP hardliners need to ask themselves one question. Which would do more damage Donald Trump at the helm four or eight years or Clinton judges making law for the next twenty?
I personally am not crazy about Trump but seriously doubt he could be as harmful in a couple of terms as HRC appointees would be for a couple of decades.
What the GOP hardliners are failing to realize is that this is not just Trump or HRC. The next president may nominate as many as four SC judges. Trump or HRC are both likely to be horrid presidents but the winner may set the course of our country for the next twenty years with their court appointments.
So the GOP hardliners need to ask themselves one question. Which would do more damage Donald Trump at the helm four or eight years or Clinton judges making law for the next twenty?
I personally am not crazy about Trump but seriously doubt he could be as harmful in a couple of terms as HRC appointees would be for a couple of decades.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
it was an endorsement of the party platform. Which was a - DHighlander KC - 7/21 17:20:00