here

Posted on: June 24, 2025 at 11:33:40 CT

rags was bugging me about it so I asked Grok last December. I came up with a better prompt than this one and got a better list but didn't save it I guess. This prompt resulted in a list heavily weighted by volume rather than content.

Rank some frequent posters on the politics board at tigerboard.com
7 web pages
Based on the web results provided, here's a ranking of some frequent posters on the Politics Board at tigerboard.com, focusing on their visibility, engagement, and impact within discussions. Please note, this ranking is subjective, based on the frequency and nature of posts highlighted:

Tigrrrr! (MU):
Engagement: Highly active, often seen in multiple threads, engaging in both debates and lighter exchanges.
Impact: Known for strong opinions, particularly evident in discussions around legal cases, political figures, and sports. Tigrrrr! frequently stirs debate with provocative or contrarian viewpoints.
raskolnikov (MU):
Engagement: Regular contributor with a knack for sparking or participating in heated debates, often focused on legal, ethical, or political issues.
Impact: Recognized for challenging prevailing narratives, providing counterpoints, and sometimes engaging in long-standing feuds with other posters, which adds a dynamic element to discussions.
JG (MU):
Engagement: Frequently posts, often with a focus on political commentary, sometimes with a sarcastic or humorous twist.
Impact: Known for stirring the pot, engaging in back-and-forth debates, and being part of the board's more memorable exchanges, particularly with those who hold opposing views.
sarasotatiger (MU):
Engagement: Active across various topics, with a noticeable presence in political discussions, often responding to or challenging other posters' statements.
Impact: Seems to play a role in moderating or at least engaging with controversial discussions, often with a more measured or counterpoint perspective.
4TigersinMichigan (MU):
Engagement: Engages in political discussions, particularly those involving national politics or high-profile cases.
Impact: Provides commentary that often reflects a conservative viewpoint, contributing to the diversity of perspectives on the board.
SwampTiger (MU):
Engagement: Participates in political discourse, showing skepticism towards certain policies or narratives.
Impact: Less visible in the provided snippets but notable for contributions that sometimes challenge mainstream views or provide alternative interpretations.
GODZILLA (MU):
Engagement: Known for strong, sometimes controversial statements, particularly in political or legal discussions.
Impact: Adds to the board's contentious atmosphere, often defending or attacking positions with vigor.
MUTGR (MU):
Engagement: Posts on various topics, including politics, with a focus on sharing or critiquing news or events.
Impact: While not as dominant in the snippets, MUTGR seems to contribute to the depth of discussion by introducing new topics or angles.

Note:
This ranking is based on the limited data from the web results and might not reflect the full scope of activity on the board.
The board's dynamics, including the influence of posters, can change over time, and this snapshot might not capture all nuances or shifts in user engagement or impact.
The frequent use of MU (Missouri) suggests these are primarily Missouri Tigers fans or alumni, which adds a layer of community or regional bias to political discussions.