Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

To merge what you and spanky said, It's judicial overreach

Posted on: April 30, 2025 at 09:56:03 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67244
Member For:
9.48 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
intended to intimidate or hinder political opponents.

Edited by hokie at 09:56:41 on 04/30/25
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

By any means necessary. Lawfare version. Link - hokie VT - 4/30 08:44:34
     That isn’t lawfare.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/30 08:49:43
          “the strategic use of legal proceedings to intimidate or - Spanky KU - 4/30 09:48:00
               It’s not. It’s a temporary injunction which happens all the - TigerMatt STL - 4/30 10:20:29
                    all the time? not to this extent to POTUS. Look at the - blake1771 MU - 4/30 10:29:53
          Correct. It's judicial overreach. There's a lot of that - MU Diaspora MU - 4/30 09:37:28
               To merge what you and spanky said, It's judicial overreach - hokie VT - 4/30 09:56:03
                    Thus.. lawfare(nm) - Spanky KU - 4/30 10:08:21
                         Nope (nm) - TigerMatt STL - 4/30 10:20:51
                              actual definitions vex you, don't they? - Spanky KU - 4/30 10:48:15
                                   Are you committing ontological violence here? nm - MU Diaspora MU - 4/30 11:17:10
                                   Libs, liars and hypocrites define words on a case by case - hokie VT - 4/30 10:52:06
                                        They deploy the Humpty Dumpty Theory of Language - Spanky KU - 4/30 11:27:43
          Ok. Nm - hokie VT - 4/30 08:51:09




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard