Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I agree in large measure, generally. The question I think is

Posted on: April 6, 2025 at 10:57:33 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
66926
Member For:
9.42 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Is where to draw the line.

It is in our best interest to have a Democratic and free Europe. How much should we be willing to pay for that? How much blood and treasure should we spend making sure the pansies in the capitals of Europe are free to turn socialist, give their countries to the Muslims, and ban what we would consider constitutional rights?

I for one I'm not particularly concerned if Russia takes Ukraine. One corrupt country swallowing another corrupt country. Europe doesn't pay its bills to NATO, so we should continue to defend them…? Screw Europe.

But when terrorists in Yemen shoot at American vessels, whether they are trading ships or military ships, we have every right in my opinion, to return fire and kill all of them.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The solution is obvious. Stop the military confrontations - BH O'bonga MU - 4/6 08:32:17
     So if terrorists attack our ships halfway around the world, - hokie VT - 4/6 10:44:11
          Shouldn't have attacked them with those ships to - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:06:11
               So with American shipping interests are attacked, it's our - hokie VT - 4/6 11:16:40
                    RE: So with American shipping interests are attacked, it's our - meatiger MU - 4/6 11:28:10
                         That's actually a fair point. Not sure it's practical. How - hokie VT - 4/6 11:33:39
                              RE: That's actually a fair point. Not sure it's practical. How - meatiger MU - 4/6 12:39:42
                              By not violating blockades, usually works (nm) - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:46:15
                    There are no American shipping interests in the Red Sea (nm) - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:18:12
                         Wow, none at all? No American ships? Not a single US - hokie VT - 4/6 11:28:42
                              Nope. Only ships bound for Isreal have come under - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:45:00
                                   Urine idiot. The linked article is from Al Jazeera. This is - hokie VT - 4/6 11:55:38
                                        It's you who ignored context - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:57:45
     Activities overseas are often tied to national interest - raskolnikov MU - 4/6 08:43:50
          I agree in large measure, generally. The question I think is - hokie VT - 4/6 10:57:33
               They already gave their countries to The Jews - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:07:27
                    Wait. Europe gave their countries to the Juze, and now - hokie VT - 4/6 11:48:03
                         The Jews will not give it to the Muslims - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:58:42
     What are we supposed to do with our "defensive" - GA Tiger MU - 4/6 08:42:07
          Let me know when they are actually defensive instead of - TigerMatt STL - 4/6 09:16:35
          There we have it! 'Use it or lose it', is what you're saying - BH O'bonga MU - 4/6 08:55:34
               So I was right. You have no idea. I've - GA Tiger MU - 4/6 10:12:18
          You have no point - Seagull MU - 4/6 08:43:24
               Why isn't my last post a "point"? - GA Tiger MU - 4/6 10:13:14
                    Because trying to justify murder with - Seagull MU - 4/6 11:04:07
     A billion dollars in 3 weeks and nothing to show for it (nm) - Seagull MU - 4/6 08:34:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard