 |
|
Purdy was a lot better passer on a less talented team.
Posted on: March 3, 2025 at 14:43:27 CT
alwaysright MU
Posts:
52185
Member For:
17.83 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Yeah, he had the better RB, but nothing else.
Cook - Purdy
62.6% - 71.7%
2535 - 3188
11/2 TD/INT - 19/8
7.9 ypa - 7.8
139 rating - 149
18.6 rush yards/game - 18.3
5 rush TD - 1
They ran with the same efficiency, but Cook ran it more in the redzone...pretty much a wash.
They only thing you can say Purdy was "worse" at is that he is a risk taker while Cook was insanely cautious this year. He threw more interceptions, but he had more TD's.
Both of them are just kind of a baller that the numbers don't really reveal, but Purdy was/is a better passer.
Cook - Purdy
62.6% - 71.7%
2535 - 3188
11/2 TD/INT - 19/8
7.9 ypa - 7.8
139 rating - 149
18.6 rush yards/game - 18.3
5 rush TD - 1
They ran with the same efficiency, but Cook ran it more in the redzone...pretty much a wash.
They only thing you can say Purdy was "worse" at is that he is a risk taker while Cook was insanely cautious this year. He threw more interceptions, but he had more TD's.
Both of them are just kind of a baller that the numbers don't really reveal, but Purdy was/is a better passer.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Purdy was a lot better passer on a less talented team. - alwaysright MU - 3/3 14:43:27