Welcome Guest

Purdy was a lot better passer on a less talented team.

Posted on: March 3, 2025 at 14:43:27 CT
alwaysright MU
Posts:
52185
Member For:
17.83 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Yeah, he had the better RB, but nothing else.

Cook - Purdy
62.6% - 71.7%
2535 - 3188
11/2 TD/INT - 19/8
7.9 ypa - 7.8
139 rating - 149

18.6 rush yards/game - 18.3
5 rush TD - 1

They ran with the same efficiency, but Cook ran it more in the redzone...pretty much a wash.

They only thing you can say Purdy was "worse" at is that he is a risk taker while Cook was insanely cautious this year. He threw more interceptions, but he had more TD's.

Both of them are just kind of a baller that the numbers don't really reveal, but Purdy was/is a better passer.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Combine does not test live action accuracy or - alwaysright MU - 3/3 11:21:47
          I think he has a chance of succeding - bagpipertiger MU - 3/3 11:47:46
               Brady Cook will be an afterthought in the NFL - Diamond Dave MU - 3/3 12:17:37
                    just getting to the NFL will be a big win for him - phrejd KC - 3/3 12:35:51
                         Absolutely. Just trying to set the delusional ones - Diamond Dave MU - 3/3 12:47:20
                              Eh, you never know. Unlikely? Yes. I kind of compare - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 3/3 13:12:19
                                   Purdy was a lot better passer on a less talented team. - alwaysright MU - 3/3 14:43:27
                                        Those are numbers from their senior seasons. If you look at - Lt. J. Dangle MU - 3/3 16:23:12
     no suprise he tested better than both of them - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 3/3 10:44:12




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard